期刊文献+

India's Policy Orientation on RCEP: Problems and Way Out

India's Policy Orientation on RCEP: Problems and Way Out
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Since they were first launched in May 2013, negotiations on the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) have been ongoing for more than three years. After 13 rounds of negotiations and four Commerce Ministers' Meetings, the original goal of concluding negotiations by the end of 2015 has been postponed one year to the end of 2016. According to the information disclosed thus far, the odds are against realizing this goal as well. India's geopolitical position and trade policy orientation have been particularly significant, and its stance and attitudes have had a profound impact on the process and direction of the RCEP negotiations. This paper is an attempt to analyze India's policy orientation concerning the RCEP as well as the interests and power games behind them, while also discussing the potential breakthrough points for advancing the RCEP negotiations. India's stance on the RCEP has a great influence on the negotiation process of the initiative. Despite the RCEP's economic and strategic significance, India's participation faces several major obstacles.
作者 He Ping
出处 《China International Studies》 2016年第5期112-130,共19页 中国国际问题研究(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1The cooperation agreements signed between India and its partners are called a variety of ways, including FTA, Preferential Trade Agreement (PTA), Trade Treaty, Trade Agreement, Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA), and Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA). For the sake of convenience, this paper will generally call them FTA. 被引量:1
  • 2Arnitendu Palit, "India-Southeast Asia Relations: Enhancing Mutual Benefits," Brookings India Impact Series, Brookings Institution India Center, May 2015. 被引量:1
  • 3Sachin Parashar, "India Becomes Part of Regional Trading Bloc Despite Chinese Opposition," The Times of India, July 8, 2013. 被引量:1
  • 4"Inputs on Initial Offer of Goods under Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), " Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India. 被引量:1
  • 5"Commerce Minister Complains of 'Sledging' in Trade Talks," The Hindu, May 2, 2016. 被引量:1
  • 6"Commerce Minister Complains of 'Sledgi ng' in Trade Talks," The Hindu, May 2, 2016. 被引量:1
  • 7"Trade Policy Review," Report by the Secretariat, World Trade Organization, WT/TPR/S/313 India, April 28, 2015, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop e/tpr_e/s313 e.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 8Bipul Chatterjee and Surendar Singh, "Why RCEP Is Vital for India," The Diplomat, March 3, 2015. 被引量:1
  • 9Suparna Karmakar, "Rulemaking in Super-RTAs: Implications for China and India," Bruegel Working Paper, March 2014. 被引量:1
  • 10Jayant Raghu Ram, "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon: the TPP's IPR Chapter Issues and Concerns for India," Center for WTO Studies, WP/CWS/200/16/Rev. 4, February 2016. 被引量:1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部