摘要
目的分析中西医联合用药治疗冠心病的临床效果。方法将我院收治的96例冠心病患者随机分为对照组和观察组,各48例。对照组患者给予西药治疗,观察组患者在对照组的基础上予以中药汤剂治疗,比较两组患者的血液流变学变化情况、复发情况、心绞痛发作频率、持续时间及临床疗效。结果观察组的总有效率为93.75%,高于对照组的77.09%(P<0.05);治疗后,两组患者的心绞痛发作频率和持续时间较治疗前均降低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后,观察组患者心绞痛发作频率和持续时间少于对照组患者,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后观察组患者血液流变学变化情况比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者6个月、12个月的复发率分别为2.08%、6.25%,低于对照组的14.58%、20.83%(P<0.05)。结论中西医联合用药治疗冠心病,疗效显著,值得临床推广。
Objective To analyze the clinical effect of traditional Chinese medicine combined western medicine in the treatment of coronary heart disease. Methods Ninety-six cases of patients with coronary heart disease admitted in our hospital was selected and randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 48 cases in each group. The control group was given western medicine treatment; while the observation group received traditional Chinese medicine treatment on the basis of control group. The blood rhealogy, recunence, angina attack frequency and duration and clinical efficacy were compared. Results The total effective rate of observation group was 93.8%, which was higher than 77.1% of the control group （P〈0.05）. After treatment, the angina attack frequency and duration of two groups were lower than before treatment, which was statistically significant （P〈0.05）; and also the observation group was lower than the control group, the difference were statistically significant （P〈0.05）. After treatment, the change of blood rheology between two groups with statistical difference（P〈0.05）. The recurrence rate of observation group at 6 months, 12 months was 2.1% and 6.3% respectively, which were lower than those of the control group with 14.6% and 20.8% （P〈0.05）. Conclusion The combination of traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine in the treatment of coronary heart disease is significant, it is worth clinical popularization.
出处
《临床医学研究与实践》
2016年第21期131-132,共2页
Clinical Research and Practice
关键词
冠心病
心绞痛
中西医
阿司匹林
coronary heart disease
angina attack
traditional Chinese medicine combined western medicine
aspirin
