摘要
目的探究急性心肌梗死患者行急诊冠脉介入治疗的治疗效果。方法选取64例急性心肌梗死患者,随机分为实验组和对照组,实验组患者采用急诊冠脉介入治疗的方法,对照组患者采用静脉溶栓的治疗方式,比较两组患者的治疗效果。结果实验组患者的住院时间短于对照组,出院时的射血分数高于对照组,半年的病情发展情况好于对照组(P<0.05)。结论急性心肌梗死患者采用急诊冠脉介入治疗,具有较好的治疗效果,提高患者的生存质量。
Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect of emergency percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods 64 patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, patients in the experimental group were treated by emergency percutaneous coronary intervention, and the control group was treated with intravenous thrombolysis, the therapeutic effect of the two groups were compared. Results The hospitalization time of the experimental group was shorter than that of the control group, and the ejection fraction was higher than that of the control group at discharge, the development of the disease was better than that of the control group（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Emergency percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction has good therapeutic effect and improve the quality of life of patients.
出处
《中国继续医学教育》
2016年第27期84-85,共2页
China Continuing Medical Education
关键词
急性心肌梗死
静脉溶栓
急诊冠脉介入
Acute myocardial infarction
Intravenous thrombolysis
Emergency coronary intervention
