期刊文献+

辅助生殖技术出生的学龄前期儿童生存质量现状调查 被引量:1

Quality of life of preschoolers born by ART
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨鲁西南地区采用辅助生殖技术出生的学龄前期儿童的生存质量现状。方法将2009—2011年在济宁医学院附属医院接受辅助生殖技术( ART)及同期自然妊娠产妇的出生儿各100名分别作为研究组与对照组,采用儿童生存质量测定量表( PedsQL)对两组儿童及家长进行调查。结果 PedsQL儿童自评量表与家长代评量表显示研究组与对照组在生理功能、情感功能、社交功能、学校表现4个方面的得分差异均无统计学意义( P〉0.05)。结论 ART出生与自然妊娠出生的学龄前期儿童生存质量现状无明显差异。 Objective To investigate the quality of life of preschoolers born by assisted reproductive technology ( ART) in southwest region of Shandong. Methods Totally 100 newborns born by ART and 100 newborns born by natural pregnancy Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University from 2009 to 2011 were selected as the study group and the control group. We use the pediatric quality of life scale ( PedsQL) to investigate the children and their parents in two groups.Results PedsQL self rating scale for children and rating scale evaluated by their parents showed that there was no significant statistically difference between the study group and the control group in physiological function, emotional function, social function and school performance (P〉0.05).Conclusions There is no significant difference in the quality of life between the preschoolers born by ART and preschoolers born by natural pregnancy.
作者 李晓云 刘凯 Li Xiaoyun Liu Kai(Reproductive Medicine, Affiliate Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272029, China (Li XY Nursing Department, Affiliate Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272029, China ( Liu K)
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2016年第25期3626-3628,共3页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词 生殖技术 辅助 儿童 学龄前期 生存质量 Reproductive technology,assist Children Preschool age Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献59

  • 1Rovers MM,Schilder AG,Zielhuis GA,Rosenfeld RM,张江平,杨妙丽,张全安.中耳炎[J].国外医学(耳鼻咽喉科学分册),2005,29(3):141-143. 被引量:433
  • 2卢奕云,郝元涛.儿童生存质量测定量表体系概况[J].中国行为医学科学,2005,14(12):1128-1129. 被引量:26
  • 3梁焕友,彭助力,潘集阳,唐倩,王萍.牙科畏惧调查(DFS)量表中文版的研制与评价[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2006,27(2):236-240. 被引量:41
  • 4李宏,赵倩.人类辅助生育技术子代生存质量的研究进展[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2007,22(2):151-153. 被引量:8
  • 5Sunderam S, Chang J, Flowers L, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance-United States, 2006 [J]. MMWR Surveill Summ, 2009,58(5 ):1-25. 被引量:1
  • 6Romundstad LB, Romundstad PR, Sunde A, et al. Effects of technology or maternal factors on perinatal outcome after assisted fertilisation: a population-based cohort study [J]. Lancet, 2008, 372 ( 9640 ):737-743. 被引量:1
  • 7Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Assisted reproductive technology and trends in low birthweight- Massachusetts, 1997-2004[J]. MMWR Morb Mortal, 2009, 58 (3): 49-52. 被引量:1
  • 8Sutter PD, Delbaere I, Gerris J, et al. Birthweight of singletons after assisted reproduction is higher after single-than after double- embryo transfer[J]. Hum Reprod, 2006, 10( 21 ): 2633-2637. 被引量:1
  • 9Laura A, Cohen B, Nannini A, et al. A population-based study of maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology in massachusetts [J]. Matem Child Health J, 2007, 11(6):517-525. 被引量:1
  • 10Reefhuis J, Honeinl MA, Schievel LA, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States [J]. Hum Reprod, 2009, 24(2): 360-366. 被引量:1

共引文献275

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部