摘要
近年来兴起的知识语境论主张,知识归赋语句的真值随语境而变,藉此解释人们因语境因素的改变而从知识归赋转为知识否定的直觉。然而,尽管知识语境论备受追捧,却也受到了恒定论、相对论及对照论等各派学者的挑战。文章通过汲取语义学/语用学界面研究成果,提倡从这种界面的视角表征知识归赋语句的性质与特点,既不否认语用因素对语义内容的充实,又不将知识归赋语句表达的语言意义与讲话者做出知识断言所传达的语用含义混为一谈,从而为一种语用恒定论做出论辩。
The emerging epistemic contextualism （EC） in recent years claims that the truth values of knowledge attributing/denying sentences vary with contexts whereby its advocates account for the intuition that people switch from knowledge attribution to knowledge denial. Although EC has gained momentum, it has been constantly challenged by proponents of invariantism, relativism and contrastivism alike. This paper aims to defend pragmatic invariantism （PI） by drawing on the semantics/pragmatics （S/P） interface research, advocating an elucidation of the nature and features of knowledge sentences from the perspective of S/P interface and maintaining that one should neither deny the existence of pragmatic encroachment on semantic content, nor confuse the linguistic meaning expressed by knowledge sentences with the implicature conveyed by speakers＇ knowledge assertions.
出处
《上海交通大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第5期33-41,共9页
Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
教育部规划基金项目"语言哲学的实验转向研究"(14YJA740022)
关键词
语境论
知识归赋
语用恒定论
可断言性条件
contextualism
knowledge attribution
pragmatic invariantism
assertability conditions
