摘要
目的研究不同机械通气治疗老年重症胸部损伤合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征的效果。方法选取我院收治的老年重症胸部损伤合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者94例,分为ABC三组,对比分析三组效果。结果B组PaO_2、PaO_2/FiO_2水平高于A、C两组,B组PaCO_2水平低于A、C两组,P<0.05;三组总有效率比较P>0.05。结论三种机械通气治疗效果好,因此需结合患者病情选择最佳的通气模式。
Objective To study the effect of different mechanical ventilation in the treatment of severe thoracic injury complicated with acute respiratory distress syndrome in elderly patients. Methods 94 cases of elderly patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome were divided into A, B, C three groups, and the effect 0fthe three groups w＆e compared and analyzed. The results were compared with three groups. Results The level of PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 in group B was higher than that in Aancl C two groups, B group PaCO2 was lower than A, C two groups, P〈0.05, three group total effective rate was P〉0.05. Conclusion Three kinds of mechanical ventilation treatment effect is good, therefore needs to he combined with the patient＇s condition to choose the best ventilation mode.
出处
《中国继续医学教育》
2016年第26期136-138,共3页
China Continuing Medical Education
关键词
老年重症胸部损伤
急性呼吸窘迫综合征
治疗
Severe thoracic injury in the elderly, Acute respiratory distress syndrome, Treatment
