摘要
作为系统功能语言学视阈下的两个"变体",悉尼模式和加的夫模式都十分注重及物性研究,但后者一直被认为是"生成性"大于"功能性"。通过两个模式及物性系统对"虚义动词"结构这一语言现象的句法分析,该研究旨在揭示两个模式不同的语言描写思想(过程意义的体现、过程类型的识别、参与者的识别)和处理方式(表示方式、对介词短语的处理、对to引导的不定式小句的处理)。研究结果表明,加的夫模式在句法应用中更具可操作性,更加遵守"以语义为中心"和"以功能为导向"原则。系统功能语言学内部两个模式的差异性具有互补意义。
Within systemic functional linguistics,both Sydney grammar and Cardiff grammar stress the importance of transitivity,but the latter is in most cases viewed as more'generative'than'functional'.This paper applies the transitivity systems of this two modals respectively to make a syntactic analysis of sentences containing'deverbal verb construction',in order to reveal and compare their different descriptions and processings on the same grammatical phenomenon.The study shows that Cardiff Model is better following the semantic-centered principle in the applications of syntactic analysis.Furthermore,this two models have not only dissimilarities but also,more importantly,complementarity.
出处
《淄博师专学报》
2016年第3期51-57,共7页
Journal of Zibo Normal College
关键词
系统功能语言学
悉尼模式
加的夫模式
虚义动词
Systemic Fuctional Linguistics
Sydney Model
Cardiff Model
Deverbal Verb Construction
