摘要
我国的行为保全制度来源于法律移植,大陆法系和普通法系为主要借鉴对象。作为两大法系的典型国家,由于渊源和司法传统差异,德国法的行为保全制度长于理论和规则一体化,美国法则长于裁量和原则一体化,各有优势和局限。在两大法系逐渐融合的时代背景下,法律借鉴主体国家需要考虑是否择取借鉴。在对两个国家进行比较之后,我国可以利用框架借鉴+细节填充的思路构建我国特色的行为保全制度。
The construction of the legal model of conduct preservation has to resort to the references of other countries,in the process of which both the civil law system and the common law system shall be considered as main referred sources. As the two typical countries for the two legal systems,the Germanlaw for conduct preservation is good at the uniformity of theory and doctrine,while the U. S. law is good at the uniformity of discretion and principle. The legal systems they represent both have superiorities and limitations on the regulation of conduct preservation. With the background of convergence,the country seeking experience should consider selectively absorbing experience from both systems. As to China,it's worthy to try the structure—detail model in the construction of the conduct preservation system after studying and comparing the two legal systems.
出处
《国家检察官学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第5期145-160,175-176,共16页
Journal of National Prosecutors College
基金
国家社科基金重大项目"审判中心视角下的刑事
民事和行政诉讼制度改革研究"(14ZDC014)的阶段性成果
关键词
行为保全
罗马法
衡平法
自由裁量
Conduct Preservation
Roman Law
Equity
Discretion
Legal Transplantation