期刊文献+

中文版吞咽生命质量量表信度和效度的研究 被引量:107

The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of swallowing quality of life questionnaire
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过对乔咽生命质量量表翻译和编制,进行心理测量学考评,建立适合中国人群使用的吞咽障碍患者生命质量评估专表。方法参考国内外推荐的量表汉化程序,将英文版吞咽生命质量量表(SWAL—QOL)编译成中文。选取吞咽障碍患者103例为受试者,并采用编译后的中文版SWAL.QOL进行评估。对其测量者间信度、重测信度、同质性信度及内容效度和结构效度进行检测。结果中文版SWAL—QOL的测量者间信度相关系数范围为0.945~0.990(P〈0.01);重测信度相关系数范围为0.965~0.992(P〈0.01);同质性信度,量表内部一致性指标Cronbachα系数范围为O.708~0.933(P〈0.01);每一个条目与其所在领域的相关系数范围为0.723~0.982(P〈0.01),且每一个条目与其所在维度的相关系数均高于与其他维度的相关系数;在10个维度各个条目的因子分析中提取出10个公因子,累计贡献率为79.029%;10个维度总分的因子分析中提取出2个公因子(吞咽相关生命质量领域和普通生命质量领域),累计贡献率为54.718%。结论中文版SWAL—QOL量表具有良好的信度和效度,可以作为一种有效的测量工具对吞咽障碍患者的生命质量进行评估。 Objective To develop the quality of life questionnaire applicable to the Chinese patients with dysphagia by the translation and modification, as well as psychometric evaluation of the original swallowing quality of life questionnaire ( SWAL-QOL). Methods The English version of the SWAL-QOL was translated into Chinese ac- cording to the well-accepted scale translation procedure. Then 103 patients with dysphagia were tested using the trans- lated Chinese SWAL-QOL. The inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, internal consistency reliability, the con- tent validity and construct validity were tested. Results The inter-rater reliability correlation coefficient of the SWAL-QOL was between 0.945-0.990 (P〈0.01). Its test-retest coefficients ranged from 0.965 to 0.992 (P〈0.01). The Cronbach coefficients ranged from 0.708 to 0.933 (P〈0.01). There revealed significant correlation between each item of SWAL-QOL and its domain, with correlation coefficients between 0.723 and 0.982 (P〈0.01). Factor analysis of each item of the 10 domains of SWAL-QOL extracted 10 common factors, which were with a cumulative contribu- tion of 79.029%. Factor analysis of the total score of the 10 dimensions extracted 2 common factors including dyspha- gia-related quality of life and general quality of life, with a cumulative contribution of 54.718%. Conclusions The Chinese version of SWAL-QOL is reliable and valid. It can be used as an effective measuring tool to evaluate the qual- ity of life of dysphagia patients.
出处 《中华物理医学与康复杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第9期669-673,共5页 Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
基金 广东省科技计划项目(2009B030801123) 广东省自然科学基金(S2013010016316)
关键词 吞咽生命质量量表 信度 效度 Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Lin BM , Starmer HM , Gourin CG.The relationship between depressivesymptoms, quality of life, and swallowing function in head and neckcancer patients 1 year after definitive therapy [ J ] . Laryngoscope,2012, 122(7) : 1518-1525.DOI: 10.1002/lary.23312. 被引量:1
  • 2Mchorney CA, Bricker DE , Robbins J, et al.The SWAL-QOL outcomestool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults : I. Conceptual foundationand item development[ J] .Dysphagia,2000,15( 3) : 115-121. 被引量:1
  • 3Mchorney CA,Bricker DE,Robbins J,et al.The SWAL-QOL outcomestool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults : II. Item reduction and pre-liminary scaling[ J] .Dysphagia,2000,15(3) : 122-133. 被引量:1
  • 4兰月,黄东锋,胡昔权,陈小妹.脑卒中患者生存质量量表的编译及使用研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2004,19(10):769-771. 被引量:40
  • 5方积乾..生存质量测定方法及应用[M],2000.
  • 6曹博..MMSE量表和MoCA量表对卒中认知障碍评估的应用比较[D].中国医科大学,2014:
  • 7伍少玲,马超,黄粉燕,燕铁斌.标准吞咽功能评定量表的临床应用研究[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2008,30(6):396-399. 被引量:166
  • 8McHorney CA,Robbins J,Lomax K,et al. The SWAL-QOL and SW-AL-CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III.Documentation of reliability and validity [ J ]. Dysphagia, 2002,17(2):97-114. 被引量:1
  • 9孙振球,徐勇勇.医学统计学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:536-541. 被引量:1
  • 10Lovell SJ, Wong HB , Loh KS, et al. Impact of dysphagia on quality-of-life in nasopharyngeal carcinoma[ J] . Head Neck, 2005,27( 10):864-872. 被引量:1

二级参考文献42

  • 1瓮长水,田哲,李敏,毕素清,徐军,于增志,霍春暖,高丽萍,王军.“起立—行走”计时测试在评定脑卒中患者功能性移动能力中的价值[J].中国康复理论与实践,2004,10(12):733-735. 被引量:30
  • 2各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33004
  • 3Daniels SK, Ballo LA, Mahoney MC, et al. Clinical predictor of dysphagia and aspiration risk :outcome measures in acute stroke patients. Arch Phy Med Rehabil,2000,81:1030-1033. 被引量:1
  • 4Ramsey DJ,Smithard DG,Kalra L. Early assessment of dysphagia and aspiration risk in acute stroke patients. Stroke,2003,34:1252-1257. 被引量:1
  • 5Ellul J, Barer D. On behalf of ESDB/COSTAR collaborative dysphagia study. Interobserver reliability of a Standardised Swallowing Assessment ( SSA). Cerebrovas Dis, 1996,6 ( Suppl 2) : 152-153. 被引量:1
  • 6Smith HA, Lee Sit, O'Neill PA,et al. The combination of bedside swallowing assessment and oxygen saturation monitoring of swallowing in acute stroke: a safe and humane screening tool. Age Ageing, 2000. 29:495-499. 被引量:1
  • 7[1]Francis G, Dorcas B. Cross-cultural adaptation of healthrelationed quality of life measures:literature review and proposed guidelines[J].J Clin Epidemiol,1993,46(12):1417-1432. 被引量:1
  • 8[3]Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM,et al.The stroke impact scale version 2.0.Evaluation of reliability,validity, and sensitivity to change[J].Stroke, 1999,30(10):2131 -2140. 被引量:1
  • 9[4]Buck D,Jacoby A,Massey A,et al. Evaluation of measures used to assess quality of life after stroke[J].Stroke, 2000,31(8): 2004-2010. 被引量:1
  • 10[5]Chwalow AJ. Cross-cultural validation of existing quality of life scales[J].Patient Educ Couns, 1995,26(1-3) :313-318. 被引量:1

共引文献357

同被引文献1052

引证文献107

二级引证文献475

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部