期刊文献+

不同喷砂条件对氧化锆/间接修复树脂双层结构剪切强度的影响 被引量:5

Effect of various conditions of sandblasting on shear bond strength between zirconia core and veneer indirect composite resin
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究不同喷砂压力、喷砂时间以及喷砂氧化铝颗粒大小对牙科氧化锆与间接修复树脂界面剪切强度的影响。方法 250个氧化锆试件根据不同的喷砂压力、喷砂时间及喷砂氧化铝颗粒大小随机分成25组,对照组氧化锆不接受表面喷砂。使用万用试验机对每一组氧化锆试件与间接修复树脂界面的剪切强度进行测量并比较。并观察断面断裂模式。结果随着喷砂时间、喷砂颗粒尺寸增加,氧化锆与间接修复树脂界面剪切强度随着增加(P<0.001;P<0.001)。喷砂压力由0.1 MPa增加至0.2 MPa时,界面剪切强度增加(P=0.036),当喷砂压力由0.2 MPa增加至0.4 MPa或0.4 MPa增加至0.6 MPa,界面剪切强度未有显著变化(P=0.609;P=0.689)。C型断裂模式随着剪切强度增加出现概率也增加。结论在牙科领域氧化锆与间接修复树脂粘结中采用21 s、0.2 MPa及110μm的喷砂条件最为适合。 Objective To evaluate the effect of sandblasting conditions including sandblasting time, sandblasting pressure and sand-blasting alumina powder size on shear bond strength between zirconia core and veneer indirect composite resin. Methods 250 zirconia bars were randomly divided into 25 groups according to different sandblasting conditions. The control group did not receive sandblasting. Shear bond strengths between zirconia and indirect composite resin were measured and compared for each group using universal testing machine. Also, fracture mode of each group was observed. Results The shear bond strength significantly increased as the size of alu-mina powder and sandblasting time increased (P〈0.001 ; P〈0.001). The shear bond strength significantly increased from 0.1 MPa to 0.2 MPa (P=0.036) and did not significantly change with a sandblasting pressure from 0.2 MPa to 0.4 MPa (P=0.609) or from 0.4 MPa to 0.6 MPa (P= 0.689). The possibilities of the fracture mode type C were higher as the bonding strength increased. Conclusion A sandblasting condition of 21 s, 0.2 MPa, and 110μm is recommended for dental application to improve the bonding between zir-conia and indirect composite resin.
出处 《口腔医学》 CAS 2016年第9期801-805,共5页 Stomatology
关键词 氧化锆 喷砂 剪切强度 断裂模式 zirconia sandblasting shear bond strength fracture mode
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Wang F,Chai Z,Deng Z,et al.Effect of heat-pressing temperature and holding time on the microstructure and flexural strength of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics[J].PLo S One,2015,10(5):e0126896. 被引量:1
  • 2Luangruangrong P,Cook NB,Sabrah AH,et al.Influence of fullcontour zirconia surface roughness on wear of glass-ceramics[J].J Prosthodont,2014,23(3):198-205. 被引量:1
  • 3Urapepon S,Taenguthai P.The effect of zirconia framework design on the failure of all-ceramic crown under static loading[J].J Adv Prosthodont,2015,7(2):146-150. 被引量:1
  • 4Ozcan M,Valandro LF,Pereira M,et al.Effect of surface conditioning modalities on the repair bond strength of resin composite to the zirconia core/veneering ceramic complex[J].J Adhes Dent,2013,15(3):207-210. 被引量:1
  • 5Taira Y,Hatono H,Tokita M,et al.Thickness and surface structure of a ceramic layer created on three indirect resin composites with aerosol deposition[J].J Prosthodont Res,2010,54(4):168-172. 被引量:1
  • 6Cetin AR,Unlu N,Cobanoglu N.A five-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite resin restorations in posterior teeth[J].Oper Dent,2013,38(2):E1-E11. 被引量:1
  • 7Sailer I,Feher A,Filser F,et al.Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures[J].Int J Prosthodont,2007,20(4):383-388. 被引量:1
  • 8Komine F,Fushiki R,Koizuka M,et al.Effect of surface treatment on bond strength between an indirect composite material and a zirconia framework[J].J Oral Sci,2012,54(1):39-46. 被引量:1
  • 9Lughi V,Sergo V.Low temperature degradation-aging-of zirconia:A critical review of the relevant aspects in dentistry[J].Dent Mater,2010,26(8):807-820. 被引量:1
  • 10Wang G,Zhang S,Bian C,et al.Effect of zirconia surface treatment on zirconia/veneer interfacial toughness evaluated by fracture mechanics method[J].J Dent,2014,42(7):808-815. 被引量:1

同被引文献43

引证文献5

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部