摘要
近些年来,行政承诺这一新型的行政管理手段已经被行政主体所广泛采用。然而,有关行政承诺的一些基本问题诸如行政承诺的具体含义是什么、行政承诺是否应当履行以及不履行是否必须承担法律责任等学界并没有达成共识。通过对行政承诺的三个焦点问题的探讨,可以明确行政承诺既不是单方性的行政行为,也与行政合同存在显著的区别,它是一种依赖于相对人选择参与才能成立的独立的具体行政行为。行政承诺的属性以及行政法的一些基本原则都决定了行政承诺原则上应当履行,只有在特殊情况下才可以不履行,而不履行行政承诺应承担相应的法律后果。
In recent years,the administrative commitment appeared as a new management means is widely used by the administrative subject.However,the academic community has not reached a consensus on some basic issues of administrative commitment,such as what is the specific meaning of administrative commitments,whether the administrative commitment should be performed and whether it should take legal responsibility if someone fails to perform.This article focuses on three hot issues of administrative commitment with the aim of making clear that the administrative commitment is not a unilateral administrative act,and there is significant difference between the administrative contract.The administrative commitment is a kind of independent specific administrative act depends on the administrative relative person choosing whether to participate in this act.The attribute of administrative commitment as well as the basic principles of administrative law determines the administrative commitment should be performed in principle,only in special circumstances can not be performed.Fails to perform the administrative commitment should bear the corresponding legal consequences.
出处
《湖南警察学院学报》
2016年第4期109-115,共7页
Journal of Hunan Police Academy
关键词
行政承诺
单方行政行为
行政合同
具体行政行为
administrative commitment
unilateral administrative act
the administrative contract
the specific administrative act
