期刊文献+

脓毒症的新标准(Sepsis 3.0):共识而富有争议 被引量:17

下载PDF
导出
摘要 脓毒症(Sepsis)是感染诱发的生理、病理和生化异常综合征,是公众健康关注的重大问题。尽管未知其确切发病率,但保守估计应是导致患者危重或死亡的重要原因,消耗大量的住院花费,且发病率在逐年上升。目前,脓毒症已成为临床治疗的重点和难点,其概念和诊断标准的进步是脓毒症临床诊治优化的必然要求。
作者 何先弟
出处 《淮海医药》 CAS 2016年第5期505-507,共3页 Journal of Huaihai Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1SINGER M, DEUTSCHMAN CS, SEYMOUR CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock ( Sepsis - 3 ) [ J ]. JAMA,2016,315 ( 8 ) : 801-810. 被引量:1
  • 2BONE RC, BALK RA, CERRA FB, et al. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference:definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guide- lines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis [ J ]. Crit Care Med,1992,20(6) :864- 874. 被引量:1
  • 3LEVY MM, FINK MP, MARSHALL1 JC, et al. International Sep- sis Definitions Conference. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/ SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference [ J ]. Intensive Care Meal,2003,29(4) :530-538. 被引量:1
  • 4KAUKONEN KM1, BAILEY M, PILCHER D,et al. Systemic in- flammatory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis [J]. N Engl J Med,2015,372 (17) :1629-1638. 被引量:1
  • 5SEYMOUR CW, LIU VX, LWASHYNA TJ, ct al. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis : For the Third International Consen- sus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock ( Sepsis-3 ) [ J ]. JA- MA,2016,315 (8) :762-774. 被引量:1
  • 6ABRAHAM E. New Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock : Con- tinuing Evolution but With Much Still to Be Done [ J ]. JAMA, 2016,315(8) :757-759. 被引量:1
  • 7SIMPSON SQ. New Sepsis Criteria: A Change We Should Not Make[J]. Chest,2016,149(5) :117-118. 被引量:1

同被引文献233

引证文献17

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部