摘要
目前,我国当事人陈述作为一种独立的证据形式。但关于其具体内容、证明价值、证据地位并不明确,而取证、质证、认证程序等方面缺乏制度化规定。2015年《民事诉讼法司法解释》导入相关程序装置,具有多重法律意义,但尚遗留部分基本问题没有解决,影响其实践运行效果。为此,本文立足于我国现有法律规定本身和现实情形,以期重新界定当事人陈述的证据地位,为后续制度设计和程序运行补上理论基础。
In China nowadays litigant＇s statement is an independent proof form. However,the specificcontents,probative value and evidence status are unclear,and what＇s more,there are short of institutionalizationprovision as in the aspect of evidence - taking,cross - examination and certification procedure. In2015,it is meaningful to set up some program device for Judicial Interpretation of the Civil Procedure Law ofThe People＇s Republic of China. But the left basic problems unsolved influence its practice results. Therefore,the paper based on China present law and regulation and actual situation tries to seek for the redefinitionof the litigant＇s statement proof status and make up the theory base of subsequent system design and programexecution.
出处
《湘南学院学报》
2016年第4期27-31,共5页
Journal of Xiangnan University
