期刊文献+

尾内侧入路单向环路式腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术的临床疗效 被引量:19

Clinical efficacy of unidirectional-loop caudal.medial approach for laparoscopic-assisted radical resectionof right colon cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨尾内侧入路单向环路式腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术的临床疗效。方法采用回顾性描述性研究方法。收集2015年1月至2016年3月中山大学附属第六医院收治的37例行尾内侧入路单向环路式腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术患者的临床资料。手术遵循无瘤原则,采用尾内侧入路单向环路式行腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术。观察指标:(1)手术情况:手术时间、术中出血量。(2)术后恢复情况:术后肛门首次排气时间、术后拔除引流管时间、术后并发症、术后住院时间。(3)术后病理学检查情况:淋巴结清扫数目、阳性淋巴结数目、标本长度、切缘情况、肿瘤病理学分期、病理学类型。(4)随访情况。采用门诊及电话方式进行随访,了解患者生存及肿瘤复发、转移情况。随访时间截至2016年6月。正态分布的计量资料以i±s表示,偏态分布的计量资料以平均数(范围)表示。结果(1)手术情况:37例患者均成功完成手术,无中转开腹,无围术期死亡患者。37例患者手术时间为(170±50)min,术中出血量为50mL(20~300mL)。(2)术后恢复情况:37例患者术后肛门首次排气时间为(3.5±1.0)d,术后拔除引流管时间为(4.3±1.1)d。术后2例患者出现伤口液化,经对症处理后好转,其余患者未发生并发症。术后平均住院时间为10d(6~21d)。(3)术后病理学检查情况:37例患者淋巴结清扫数目为(22±8)枚,其中阳性淋巴结数目为0枚(0~6枚),中央淋巴结清扫数目为(6±5)枚。标本长度为(32±9)cm,切缘均为阴性。术后肿瘤病理学分期:pT1期0例,pq2期1例,pT3期33例,pT4a期3例;pN0期23例,pNl期12例,pN2期2例。病理学类型:黏液腺癌3例,高分化腺癌7例,中分化腺癌23例,低分化腺癌4例。(4)随访情况:37例患者均获得术后随访。随访时� Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of unidirectional-loop caudal-medial approach for laparoscopic-assisted radical resection of right colon cancer. Methods The retrospective and descriptive study was performed. The clinical data of 37 patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted radical resection of right colon cancer through unidirectional-loop caudal-medial approach at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2015 to March 2016 were collected. Tumor-free principle was followed and unidirectional-loop caudal-medial approach was conducted. Observation indicators included : ( 1 ) surgical situations : operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, (2) postoperative recovery: time to initial anal exsufflation, time of draining tube removal, postoperative complications, duration of postoperative hospital stay, (3) postoperative pathological examination: number of lymph node dissection, number of positive lymph node, length of specimen, incision margin, tumor pathological staging and type, (4) follow-up. All the patients were followed up using outpatient examination and telephone interview up to June 2016. Measurement data with normal distribution were presented as x ± s and measurement data with skewed distribution were presented as average (range). Results ( 1 ) Surgical situations: 37 patients received successful operation, without conversion to open surgery and perioperative death. Operation time and volume of intraoperative blood loss in 37 patients were (170 ± 50)minutes and 50 mL (range, 20-300 mL). (2) Postoperative recovery: time to initial anal exsufflation, time of draining tube removal and average duration of postoperative hospital stay were ( 3.5 ± 1. 0)day, (4.3 ± 1. 1 ) (lays and 10 days ( range, 6- 21 days), respectively. Two patients with postoperative wound liquefaction were improved by symptomatic treatment,and the other patients had no complication. (3)Postoperative pathological exa
出处 《中华消化外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第9期928-932,共5页 Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery
基金 广东省科技计划项目(2013B0Z2000060) 中山大学临床医学研究5010计划项目(2016005)
关键词 结肠肿瘤 全结肠系膜切除 尾内侧入路 单向环路 腹腔镜检查 Colonic neoplasms Tolal mesocolic excision Caudal-medial approach Umidirectional-loop Laparoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, et al. Survival after laparo- scopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term out- come of a randomised clinical trial [ J]. Lancet Oncol, 2009,10 ( 1 ) :44-52. DOI:10. 1016/S1470-2045(08)70310-3. 被引量:1
  • 2Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery ver- sus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a ran- domised trial [ J ]. Lancet Onco1,2005,6 ( 7 ) :477-484. DOI : 10. 1016/S1470-2045 (05) 70221-7. 被引量:1
  • 3Fleshman J, Sargent D J, Green E, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group Trial [ J ]. Ann Surg, 2007,246 (4) : 655- 664. DOI : 10. 1097/SLA. 0bO13e318155a762. 被引量:1
  • 4Juo YY, Hyder O, Haider AH, et al. Is minimally invasive colon resection better than traditional approaches?: First comprehensive national examination with propensity score matching [ J ]. JAMA Surg,2014, 149 (2) : 177-184. DOI: 10. 1001/jamasurg. 2013. 366O. 被引量:1
  • 5Li JC, Leung KL, Ng SS, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open resection of right-sided colonic cancer-a prospective randomized controlled trial[ J ]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2012,27 ( 1 ) : 95-102. DOI : 10. 1007/s00384-011-1294-5. 被引量:1
  • 6Stucky CC, Pockaj BA, Novotny PJ, et al. Long-term follow-up and individual item analysis of quality of life assessments related to laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in the COST trial 93-46-53 (INT 0146) [J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2011,18(9) :2422-2431. DOI:10. 1245/s10434-011-1650-2. 被引量:1
  • 7徐东楚,郭云虎,包磊,刘永健,孙爱和.腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术不同手术入路的疗效比较[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2016,19(3):226-228. 被引量:44
  • 8Zimmermann M, Benecke C, Jung C, et al. Laparoscopic resec- tion of right colon cancer- a matched pairs analysis [ J ]. Int J Colorectal Dis,2016,31 ( 7 ) : 1291-1297. DOI: 10. 1007/s00384- 016-2590-x. 被引量:1
  • 9郑波波,王楠,吴涛,乔庆,周帅,张波,杨莹,谢爽,王珂,何显力.改良中间入路与传统中间入路在腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中的比较研究[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2015,18(8):812-816. 被引量:35
  • 10何金杰,丁克峰.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的质量控制[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2015,18(8):759-762. 被引量:20

二级参考文献99

共引文献163

同被引文献156

引证文献19

二级引证文献98

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部