期刊文献+

谁的莎士比亚?——2010—2015国外莎士比亚研究述评 被引量:4

Whose Shakespeare?: Shakespeare Studies in the West, 2010-2015
原文传递
导出
摘要 进入21世纪的第二个十年,西方莎学研究继续蓬勃发展。从选题上看,西方莎学研究呈现多元、创新之势,但就研究方法而言,其实基本可分为两大类:"历史主义"和"当下主义"。前者强调莎士比亚创作的历史性,后者则结合当下研究莎士比亚。本文比较历史主义和当下主义研究的指导思想和方法实践,分析这两种研究方法的异同、出现的原因和意义,并评述新世纪以来西方莎学研究的现状。 Behind the staggering number and variety of topics of Shakespeare studies between 2010 and 2015, there are two fundamental and seemingly opposing approaches: the historicist and the presentist. This article, by comparing the theories and practices of historicism and presentism, seeks to analyze the cause of their rise and significance of their practice. It also offers a survey of Shakespeare studies in the West today.
作者 陈星
出处 《当代外国文学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期154-159,共6页 Contemporary Foreign Literature
关键词 莎学研究 历史主义 当下主义 Shakespeare studies historicism presentism
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Arts and Humanities Research Council ( AHRC ). Impact Summary and Pathways to Impact: Frequently AskedQuestions—AHRC. <http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/documents/faq/impact-summary-and-pathways-to-impact-frequently-asked-questions-ahrc/>. 被引量:1
  • 2Clare, Janet. Shakespeare,s Stage Traffic: Imitation, Borrowing and Competition in Renaissance Theatre.Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2014. 被引量:1
  • 3DiPietro, Cary, and Hugh Grady. “Introduction.” Shakespeare and the Urgency of Now: Criticism and Theory in the21st Century. Ed. Cary DiPietro and Hugh Grady. New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 2013. 1-8. 被引量:1
  • 4Eagleton, Terry. How to Read a Poem. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007. 被引量:1
  • 5Escolme, Bridget. Emotional Excess on the Shakespearean Stage: Passion’s Slaves. London: Bloomsbury, 2014. 被引量:1
  • 6Femie, Ewan. “Shakespeare and the Prospects of Presentism.” Shakespeare Survey 58 ( 2005 ) : 169-84. 被引量:1
  • 7Gajowski,Evelyn. “Beyond Historicism: Presentism, Subjectivity, Politics.” Literature Compass 7.8 (2010):674-91. 被引量:1
  • 8Grady, Hugh. “Shakespeare Studies, 2005; A Situated Overview/’ Shakespeare 1.1-2( 2005 ): 102-20. 被引量:1
  • 9Gray, Patrick, and John D. Dox. “Introduction.” Shakespeare and Renaissance Ethics. Ed. Patrick Gray and John D.Dox. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2014. 1-34. 被引量:1
  • 10Greenblatt, Stephen. “Resonance and Wonder.” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 43.3 ( 1990 ):11-34. 被引量:1

同被引文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部