摘要
目的比较腹腔镜与开腹条件下行全子宫切除术的临床治疗效果。方法选取2014年5月至2015年5月于我院就诊治疗的88例患者,根据手术方式分为腹腔镜组和开腹组,对两组患者的术中、术后情况及术后并发症进行统计学比较。结果经比较发现腹腔镜组术中出血、排气时间、下床活动时间、体温恢复时间、术后住院时间及术后并发症发生率均低于开腹组,但手术时间长于开腹组,且差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后留置导尿管时间经比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腹腔镜组手术并发症的发生率低于开腹组,且差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜下全子宫切除术的术中临床效果及术后恢复情况均优于开腹手术。因此,腹腔镜下全子宫切除术值得临床推广。
Objective To compare the clinical therapeutic effect of total hysterectomy under conditions of laparoscopy and laparotomy.Methods Eighty-eight patients were selected in our hospital from May 2014 to May 2015.According to the operation method,the patients were divided into laparoscopy group and laparotomy group,intraoperative and postoperative condition of two groups of patients and the postoperative complications were statistically compared.Results Intraoperative bleeding,exhaust time,ambulation time,temperature recovery time and postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complication rates of laparoscopic group were lower than those of laparotomy group.The operation time laparoscopy group was longer than that of laparotomy group,and the difference had statistical significance（P〈0.05）.As for postoperative urethral catheter time,there was no statistically significant difference by comparison（P〈0.05）.The incidence of complications of laparoscopic group was lower than that of laparotomy group,and the difference had statistical significance（P〈0.05）.Conclusion The intraoperative clinical effect and postoperative recovery of laparoscopi total hysterectomy are better than those of open operation.Therefore,laparoscopic total hysterectomy is worth clinical promotion.
出处
《滨州医学院学报》
2016年第4期266-268,共3页
Journal of Binzhou Medical University
