期刊文献+

一期与分期输尿管软镜治疗双侧上尿路结石的疗效比较 被引量:15

Same-session Bilateral Versus Staged Unilateral Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Upper Urinary System Stones
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨一期与分期输尿管软镜下碎石术(flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy,FURL)治疗双侧上尿路结石的临床疗效。方法我院2012年9月~2015年5月一期输尿管软镜下钬激光碎石术治疗双侧上尿路结石29例(一期手术组),分期输尿管软镜治疗双侧上尿路结石20例(分期手术组),比较2组总手术时间、总住院时间、结石清除率、并发症发生率。结果 2组患者均顺利完成手术。一期手术组总手术时间明显短于分期手术组[(71.0±19.0)min vs.(112.6±26.8)min,t=-6.366,P=0.000],2组总住院时间无统计学差异[(6.9±3.6)d vs.(8.4±2.1)d,t=-1.674,P=0.101]。2组患者术后4周结石清除率分别为79.3%(23/29)、80.0%(16/20),无统计学差异(χ~2=0.000,P=1.000);2组术后并发症发生率无统计学差异[20.7%(6/29)vs.15.0%(3/20),χ~2=0.017,P=0.896]。结论一期双侧输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术可有效、安全治疗双侧上尿路结石,但仍需严格把握手术适应证。 Objective To analyze the efficacy and safety of same-session bilateral and staged unilateral flexible ureteroseopie lithotripsy (FURL) with holmium laser for the treatment of upper urinary system stones. Methods Clinical data of 29 patients who underwent same-session bilateral FURL (same-session group) and 20 patients who received staged unilateral FURL (staged group) from September 2012 to May 2015 at this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The overall operation time, overall hospital stay, stone free rate (SFR) and overall complication rate were compared between the two groups. Results The operations were successfully completed in both groups. The overall operative time was significantly longer for staged unilateral FURL than bilateral FURL [ (71.0 ±19.0) rnin vs. ( 112.6 ±26.8) min, t = - 6. 366, P = 0. 000 ]. The overall hospital stay was slightly longer for staged unilateral FURL than bilateral FURL [(6.9±3.6) d vs. (8.4 ±2. 1 )d, t = -1.674, P =0. 101]. The four-week postoperative SFR for bilateral FURL and staged unilateral FURL were 79.3% (23/29) and 80.0% (16/20), respectively (X2 = 0. 000, P = 1. 000). The 2 overall complication rate was slightly higher for bilateral FURL [20.7% (6/29) vs. 15.0% (3/20), X = 0. 017, P = 0. 8961. Conclusion Same-session bilateral flexible ureteroseopie holmium laser lithotripsy is a safe and effective treatment for bilateral upper urinary system stones in select patients.
出处 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第9期816-819,共4页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
关键词 输尿管软镜 结石 结石清除率 Flexible ureteroscope Calculi Stone free rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Sanguedolce F, Liatsikos E , Verze P , et al. Use of flexibleureteroscopy in the clinical practice for the treatment of renal stones:results from a large European survey conducted by the EAU YoungAcademic Urologists-Working Party on Endourology and Urolithiasis.Urolithiasis,2014,42 (4) :329 -334. 被引量:1
  • 2那彦群,叶章群,孙颖浩等著..中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南手册 2014版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:830.
  • 3Breda A, Angerri 0. Retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stoneslarger than 2.5 cm. Curr Opin Urol, 2014,24 (2) : 179 -183. 被引量:1
  • 4Kumar A, Vasudeva P, Nanda B , et al. A prospective randomizedcomparison between shock wave lithotripsy and flexibleureterorenoscopy for lower caliceal stones ≤ 2 cm: a single-centerexperience. J Endourol, 2015, 29(5) :575 -579. 被引量:1
  • 5De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomyversus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and metaanalysis.Eur Urol,2015,67(1 ) : 125 - 137. 被引量:1
  • 6杨波,胡卫国,胡浩,陈亮,李建兴,王晓峰.逆行肾内手术治疗肾结石失败的原因分析及其对策[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2014,46(5):794-797. 被引量:13
  • 7朱世斌,李恭会,张志根.预留置输尿管支架管对首次输尿管软镜碎石术中放置工作鞘的影响. 世界临床医学,2015,9 ( 4 ) :59 -60. 被引量:1
  • 8Cepeda M, Amon JH, Mainez JA, et al. Flexible ureteroscopy forrenal stones. Actas Urol Esp ,2014,38 ( 9 ) :571 -575. 被引量:1
  • 9Torricelli FC, De S, Hinck B , et al. Flexible ureteroscopy with aureteral access sheath: when to stent- Urology, 2014,83(2) :278 -281. 被引量:1
  • 10Hollenbeck BK, Schuster TG, Faerber GJ, et al. Safety andefficacy of same-session bilateral ureteroscopy. J Endourol, 2003,17(10) :881 - 885. 被引量:1

二级参考文献24

  • 1程跃,刘冠琳.输尿管软镜治疗鹿角形结石的发展与展望[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2013,2(3):163-165. 被引量:23
  • 2Takagi T, Go T, Takayasu H, et al. Fiberoptic pyeloureteroscope [J]. Surgery, 1971,70(5) : 661 -663. 被引量:1
  • 3那彦群,叶章群,孙颖浩,等.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断和治疗指南[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:141-142. 被引量:1
  • 4Abdelshehid C, Ahlering MT, Chou D, et al. Comparison of flexi- ble ureteroscopes: reflection, irrigant flow and optical characteris- tics[J]. J Urol, 2005, 173(6): 2017-2021. 被引量:1
  • 5Resorlu B, Oguz U, Resorlu EB, et al. The impact ot pelvica- liceal anatomy on the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery inpa- tients with lower pole renal stones [ J ]. Urology, 2012, 79 ( 1 ) : 61 - 66. 被引量:1
  • 6Preminger GM. Management of lower pole renal calculiI: shock wave litbotripsyversus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy[ J]. Urol Res, 2006, 34(2) : 1108 -1111. 被引量:1
  • 7Hyams ES, Munver R, Bird VG. Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renalstone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience[ J]. J En- dourol, 2010, 24(10): 1583-1588. 被引量:1
  • 8Schuster TG, Hollenbeek BK, Faerber GJ, et al. Complications of ureteroseopy : analysis of predictivefaetors [ J ]. J Urol, 2001, 166 (2) : 538 -540. 被引量:1
  • 9Monga M, Best S, Venkatesh R, et al. Durability of flexible ureteroscopes : a randomized, prospective study [ J ]. J Urol, 2006, 176(1) : 137 -141. 被引量:1
  • 10Prabhakar M. Retrograde ureteroscopic intrarenal surgery for large (1.6-3.5 cm) upper ureteric/renal calculus[J].{H}INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY,2010,(1):46-49. 被引量:1

共引文献77

同被引文献93

引证文献15

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部