期刊文献+

科学发明中原型启发的创造性思维成分及其脑机制 被引量:3

The creative components and neural mechanism of prototype heuristics in scientific innovation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前对创造性思维的测量及神经机制的研究,国际上大多采用发散思维任务、远距离联想测验、顿悟问题解决等任务。但这些测量工具大多停留在对非科学类问题解决的研究上,因此生态效度和预测效度都不高。本项目在前面研究的基础上,探讨更符合现实生活的科学发明中原型启发的创造性思维成分及机制。研究一通过两个行为实验探索原型启发能力的创造性思维成分测试的结构效度;研究二运用大样本磁共振数据,从脑机制上进一步验证创造性思维成分的结构效度;研究三通过3个核磁任务态探索原型启发能力的主要创造性思维成分的脑机制;研究四试图在高校和企业研发机构进行跟踪研究,检验创造性思维成分测试的预测效度。通过本项目的开展,希望开发具有更高预测效度和生态效度的用于发明创造领域的创造性测量工具。 Currently, divergent thinking task, remote association task and insight task have been widely used in evaluating one's creativity ability and the neural mechanism of creativity. However, these tools are non-scientific problem-solving tasks, the ecological validity and predictive validity are limited. Based on the previous studies, this project aims at investigating the creativity construct and mechanism of prototype heuristic with real scientific innovation problem. In the first study, two behavior experiments were adopted to explore the creativity components of prototype heuristics in scientific innovation problem solving. The second study examined the construct validity of these creativity components with the functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging data. In the third study, three fMRI experiments were adopted to explore the brain mechanism of creativity components of prototype heuristics When participants tried to solve scientific innovation problem. The last study tested the predictive validity of these creativity component tests with tracking study in colleges and companies. The ultimate goal of this project was developing new creative thinking tests which have desirable predictive validity and ecological validity.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第8期1139-1146,共8页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(31470981 31571137) 中国博士后科学基金(2015M580767)资助项目
关键词 科学发明 问题解决 创造性 原型启发 神经机制 scientific innovation problem solving creativity prototype heuristic neural mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1沈汪兵,刘昌,施春华,袁媛.创造性思维的性别差异[J].心理科学进展,2015,23(8):1380-1389. 被引量:35
  • 2张庆林,Steinberg,R.J.(2002).影学拦研夕分手力铲成都:四川教育出版社. 被引量:1
  • 3张庆林,邱江,曹贵康.顿悟认知机制的研究述评与理论构想[J].心理科学,2004,27(6):1435-1437. 被引量:108
  • 4张庆林,田燕,邱江.顿悟中原型激活的大脑自动响应机制:灵感机制初探[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2012,34(9):1-10. 被引量:20
  • 5Abraham, A., Pieritz, K., Thybusch, K., Rutter, B., Kr6ger, S., Schweckendiek, J., Hermann, C. (2012). Creativity and the brain: Uncovering the neural signature of conceptual expansion. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1906-1917. 被引量:1
  • 6Baer, J. (2011). How divergent thinking tests mislead us: Are the torrance tests still relevant in the 21st century? The division 10 debate. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(4), 309-313. 被引量:1
  • 7Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Kaufman, S. B., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Default and executive network coupling supports creative idea production. Scientific Reports, 5, 10964. 被引量:1
  • 8Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2014). Does insight problem solving predict real-world creativity? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), 287-292. 被引量:1
  • 9Benedek, M., K6nen, T., & Neubauer, A. C. (2012). Associative abilities underlying creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(3), 273-281. 被引量:1
  • 10Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas. Neurolmage, 88, 125-133. 被引量:1

二级参考文献47

共引文献151

同被引文献25

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部