期刊文献+

侧俯卧位、俯卧位和左侧卧位下胸腔镜食管切除术治疗食管癌短中期疗效的随机对照试验 被引量:2

Short- and Mid-term Outcomes of Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Subtotal Esophagectomy via Thoracoscopy in Lateral Prone Position,Left Lateral Position,or Prone Position:A Randomized Controlled Trial
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较侧俯卧位、俯卧位和左侧卧位胸腔镜下食管切除术治疗食管癌的临床效果。方法2010年1月至2013年2月在徐州市肿瘤医院胸心外科接受胸腔镜食管切除术、临床分期在T3N1M0以下的121例食管癌患者随机分为3组,其中侧俯卧位组43例【男24例、女19例,年龄(61.5±1.5)岁】,俯卧位组39例【男21例、女18例,年龄(63.2±1.7)岁】,左侧卧位组39例[男22例、女17例,年龄(60.1±1.6)岁]。结果 三组手术平均手术时间分别为232(165~296)min、230(170~310)min和280(190~380)min,差异有统计学意义(P〈O.05);术中平均出血量分别为262(185~330)ml、275(100~320)ml和350(120~560)m1,差异无统计学意义(P〉O.05);平均清扫淋巴结数分别为为19.1(9~26)枚/例、18.4(11—23)枚/例和10.9(6~21)枚/例,差异有统计学意义(P〈O.05)。全组患者无手术期死亡,三组患者术后并发症发生率分别为10例(23_3%)、9例(23.1%)和11例(28.2%),差异无统计学意义(均P〉O.05)。侧俯卧位组术后平均随访19.2(6~31)个月,20例死亡;俯卧位组术后平均随访20.7(8~29)个月,18例死亡;左侧卧位组术后平均随访18.5(12—33)个月,2l例死亡。三组术后死亡发生率差异无统计学意义(均P〉O.05)。结论三种体位下胸腔镜食管癌切除术均安全、可行,但采用侧俯卧位和俯卧位较左侧卧位手术时间较短并有利于淋巴结清扫,而侧俯卧位组具有在中转开胸时能够更迅速简便地改变体位的优点。 Objective To compare the short- and mid-term outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer after subtotal esophagectomy via thoracoscopy in lateral prone position, prone position, or left lateral position. Methods This randomized prospectively controlled study was conducted in 121 patients receiving subtotal esophagectomy via thoracoscopy between January 2010 and February 2013. The patients were randomly assigned into three groups to underwent esopha- gectomy in lateral prone position, prone position, or left lateral position, respectively. Forty-three patients (24 males, 19 females, 61.5±1.5 years) underwent surgery in lateral prone position, 39 patients (21 males, 18 females, 63.2±1.7 years) in prone position and other 39 patients (22 males, 17 females, 60.1±1.6 years) in left lateral position. Esophagogastric anastomosis was performed in the left neck. Results The median operative time in the three groups was 232 (165-296) min, 230 (170-310) min, and 280 (190-380) min, respectively (P〈0.05). The median perioperative bleeding was 262 (185-330) ml, 275 (100-320) ml and 350 (120-560) ml, respectively (P〉0.05). The average number of harvested lymph nodes was 19.1 (9-26), 18.4 (11-23), 10.9 (6-21), respectively (P〈0.05). The postoperative medical complications occurred in 10, 9 and 11 patients in three groups, respectively, with no statistical difference. Twenty patients died in the lateral proneposition group after a median follow-up period of 19.2 a median follow-up period of 20.7 (8-29) months, and follow-up period of 18.5 (12-33) months. Conclusion (6-31) months, 18 patients died in the prone position group after 21 patients died in the left lateral position group after a median The results confirm the feasibility and safety of this minimally invasive esophagectomy via thoracoscopy in lateral prone position, prone position, or left lateral position for patients with esophageal carcinoma. A possible advantage of lateral prone techniq
出处 《中国胸心血管外科临床杂志》 CAS CSCD 2016年第9期864-868,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
基金 江苏省博士后科研资助计划(1201079C)~~
关键词 食管肿瘤 胸腹腔镜手术 食管切除术 侧俯卧位 俯卧位 Esophageal neoplasms Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy Esophagectomy Lateral prone position Prone position
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Lerut T, Coosemans W, De Leyn P, et al. Optimizing treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 2001, 10(4): 863-884. 被引量:1
  • 2Vrouenraets BC, van Lanschot JJ. Extent of surgical resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas. Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 2006, 15(4):781-791. 被引量:1
  • 3侯予龙,赵建强,郭伟,臧豹,唐德荣.俯卧位电视胸腔镜下游离食管治疗食管癌41例临床分析[J].中华全科医师杂志,2012,11(3):224-226. 被引量:4
  • 4Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position: experience of 130patients. J Am CoU Surg, 2006, 203(1): 7-16. 被引量:1
  • 5Fabian T, McKelvey AA, Kent MS, et al. Prone thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc, 2007, 21(9): 1667-1670. 被引量:1
  • 6Luketich ]D, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al, Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg, 2003, 238(4): 486-494. 被引量:1
  • 7Braghetto I, Csendes A, Cardemil G, et al. Open transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality and survival Surg Endosc, 2006, 20(11): 1681-1686. 被引量:1
  • 8Bizekis C, Kent MS, Luketich JD, et al. Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg, 2006, 82(2): 402-406. 被引量:1
  • 9Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Lemoine PH, et al.Roberts PF, Goodnight JE, Jr.Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann "[horac Surg, 2001, 72(2): 593-596. 被引量:1
  • 10侯予龙,赵建强,臧豹,唐德荣,郭伟,杨志健.3D腔镜在食管癌手术治疗中的应用[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2014,30(10):635-636. 被引量:4

二级参考文献33

  • 1张灿斌,李简,郑建,王强.胃管成形术在食管重建中的可行性研究[J].河南科技大学学报(医学版),2005,23(3):175-179. 被引量:128
  • 2黄耀龙.切除胃小弯管状胃与食管分层套入吻合法276例的临床休会[J].广西医学,2007,29(6):845-846. 被引量:4
  • 3Stable BE,Pasaaro E Jr.Recurrent peptic ulcer.Gastro-enterology,1976,70(1):124-135. 被引量:1
  • 4Maruyama K,Kitamura M,Izumi K,et al.Postoperative lung volume calculated by chest computed tomography in patients with esophageal cancer.Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,1999,47(5):193-198. 被引量:1
  • 5Vrouenraets BC, van Lanschot JJ. Extent of surgical resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenoeareinomas. Surg Oneol Clin N Am, 2006,15:781-791. 被引量:1
  • 6Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta- analysis. Ann Thorac Surg, 2001,72:306-313. 被引量:1
  • 7Fabian T, McKelvey AA, Kent MS, et al. Prone thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc, 2007,21 : 1667-1670. 被引量:1
  • 8Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al.Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg,2003 ,238 :486-494. 被引量:1
  • 9Bizekis C, Kent MS, Luketich JD, et al. Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg, 2006,82:402-406. 被引量:1
  • 10Avital S, Zundel N, Szomstein S, et al. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Am J Surg, 2005,190:69- 74. 被引量:1

共引文献83

同被引文献22

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部