期刊文献+

体系性的探寻与中国哲学史书写范式的革新——以《墨子》为例

Internal vs.External Perspectives in Writing about the History of Chinese Philosophy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从外在的角度入手解读经典容易导致对经典自身逻辑的忽视,甚至被肢解。内观法叙述文本的出发点是寻找文本的最高哲学范畴和最基础哲学范畴,关注范畴或者观念在整个观念或者思想系统中的层次性和相对地位,关注对文本自身思维进程和思维方法的把握。内观法对文本的书写,其核心线索一定是文本自身的思维进程。《墨子》的最高范畴无疑的是"天"和"天志"。"仪法"显示基本思维进程。《墨子》前半部分思想自成体系,其主要的范畴是天、天志、天意、正、兼、义正、力正、天德、贼、利、三表等等。这些范畴具有体系性。内观法为体系法,其实质即展示哲学个性的个性法和哲学创新的创新法。 Interpreting Chinese classics from an external perspective may easily lead to neglect or even disruption of the internal logic of the classics.Starting with the search for the principal philosophical categories embedded in the texts,an internal perspective lays stress on the hierarchical and relative status of categories or ideas in the entire ideological system,as well as on the inherent process and method of philosophical thinking represented in the texts.Interpreting classic texts from the internal perspective is directed at their process of philosophical thinking.This paper focuses on the Mozi to show that the internal perspective is actually a systematic methodology for identifying philosophical character and innovation.
出处 《孔学堂》 2015年第3期81-87,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,共19页 Confucian Academy
关键词 《墨子》 体系 范式 Mozi systematic philosophy philosophic writing history of Chinese philosophy internal perspective
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部