摘要
目的探究护理干预措施对心肌梗死急性发作患者负面情绪及心绞痛发病率的影响。方法选取120例心肌梗死急性发作患者,按照数字表法随机分均分为试验组与对照组,分别给予护理干预措施、常规护理措施,对比2组患者的抑郁焦虑评分及心绞痛发病率情况。结果护理前,2组患者的焦虑及抑郁评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。护理后,试验组患者的抑郁评分(4.19±0.49)分、焦虑评分(5.58±1.41)分显著低于对照组抑郁评分(5.58±0.69)分、焦虑评分(9.46±1.53)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。护理后,试验组患者的心绞痛发病率为3.33%,显著低于对照组的38.33%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论心肌梗死急性发作患者采用护理干预措施后效果显著,可改善负面情绪,降低心绞痛发病率,临床意义重大。
Objective To explore effect of nursing intervention on the incidence of angina and negative emotions in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods A total of 120 patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomized into experimental group receiving nursing care inter- ventions and control group with conventional nursing. Depression, anxiety scores and the incidence of angina in the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results There was no significant difference in the depression and anxiety scores between two groups before treatment （P 〉 0.05 ）. The depression score was （4.19 ±0.49） points and anxiety score was （5.58±1.41 ） points in the experimental group, which were obviously lower than （5.58 ± 0.69） points and （9.46 ± 1.53 ） points in the con- trol group （P 〈 0.05 ）. The incidence of angina in the experimental group was 3.33% , which was significantly lower than 38.33% in the control group （P 〈 0.05 ）. Conclusion Nursing intervention has significant effects in patients with acute exacerbation of myocardial infarction, it can improve neg- ative emotions, reduce the incidence of angina, and exert clinical significance.
出处
《实用临床医药杂志》
CAS
2016年第16期4-6,10,共4页
Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
关键词
急性心肌梗死
护理干预
负面情绪
心绞痛
acute myocardial infarction
nursing intervention
negative emotions
angina
