摘要
随着近年来国际体系的失衡,美国国内就美国"大战略"展开了激烈的辩论。辩论聚焦于两种战略选项:在国际体系失衡的背景下,美国应继续推行以深度介入世界事务为主要特征的霸权战略,还是应该开始实施以缩减国际承诺和前沿部署为主要内容的收缩战略。深度介入的支持者认为,美国仍然能承受霸权的成本,并且深度介入能给美国带来可观的安全收益和经济收益;战略收缩的支持者则认为,为应对权力相对衰落所带来的挑战,美国应该减少所承担的国际义务,收敛霸权抱负,以实现战略手段与战略目标的平衡。当前美国的对外战略论争隐含着"美国仍在国际体系中拥有支配地位"的假定,这种支配地位能给美国提供不同的战略选择;同时这也隐含着"霸权衰落后美国该怎么办"的战略焦虑,体现了美国对外战略谋划的敏感性和前瞻性。
For the disequilibrium in the international system in recent years,the United States debate heatedly on its grand strategy. The debate focuses on two arguments: Should the United States continue to follow the grand strategy of deep engagement or should it pursue the grand strategy of retrenchment?Advocates of deep engagement argue that the United States can still bear the cost of hegemony,and deep engagement can bring the US considerable security and economic benefits,While the supporters of retrenchment argue that the United States should shift some of its international commitments to its allies and partners so as to maintain the balance between the means and the ends of the grand strategy. One thing the debate on the grand strategy implies is that the United States still plays a dominant part in the interna-tional system which can provide it different options of the grand strategy;the other implies the strategic anxieties of the US about its relative decline which shows the sensitivity and foresight of its strategic planning.
出处
《美国研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第4期37-57,5-6,共21页
The Chinese Journal of American Studies
基金
国家社科基金一般项目"区域外大国对南海问题的介入及其影响研究"(项目编号:16BGJ055)的阶段性研究成果
