摘要
目的:研究后位切扩术与侧位切扩术治疗肛裂的临床效果。方法:遴选某院接受并治疗的肛裂患者88例进行分组,对照组44例接受侧位切扩术治疗,实验组44例则采取后位切扩术治疗,比较两组临床疗效及手术情况。结果:实验组患者的治疗总有效率高达100.0%,与总有效率为86.4%的对照组相比明显更高(P<0.05);实验组患者的术中失血量、创面愈合时间较对照组明显更多,而切口感染率则低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:肛裂给予后位切扩术与侧位切扩术均有各自适应症,临床应根据患者情况来遴选手术方案。
Objective The clinical effect of cutting dilatation and lateral shear dilatation in the treatment of anal fissure. Methods： 88 cases with anal fissure were selected who were divided into the control group （44 cases） underwent lateral incision and dilation treatment, the experimental group 44 cases took a cut dilation, then clinical curative effect and surgical operation of the two groups were compared. Results： The total effective rate of the treatment group was 100% , and the total effective rate was 86.4% in the control group （P〈 0.05） ; the patients in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group, while the wound infection rate was lower than that in the control group （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： Cutting dilatation and lateral position cuts dilatation in anal fissure have their respective indications, which should be selected according to patient＇s condition in clinic.
出处
《数理医药学杂志》
2016年第9期1305-1306,共2页
Journal of Mathematical Medicine
关键词
肛裂
后位切扩术
侧位切扩术
anal fissure
cutting expansion technique
oblique cutting expansion technique
