摘要
目的探究微创式胸腔闭式引流术治疗慢阻肺合并气胸的疗效。方法方便选取70例于2014年3月—2015年3月该院接收的慢阻肺合并气胸患者,将其根据治疗方式不同分为对照组与实验组,组内患者均为35例,两组分别行常规胸腔闭式引流术和微创胸腔闭式引流装置,观察两组疗效。结果实验组治愈率94.3%与对照组的97.1%基本一致(P>0.05),但操作时间、肺复张时间、住院时间、胸痛时间、疼痛时间分别为(11.5±3.8)min、(2.32±1.85)d、(7.25±2.80)d、(1.75±1.12)d、(1.7±0.7)分明显少于对照组的(27.3±5.3)min、(3.75±2.75)d、(10.24±3.14)d、(9.21±2.35)d、(6.2±1.5)分(P<0.05);不良反应率为11.4%较对照组57.1%明显要低(P<0.05),差异有统计学意义。结论慢阻肺合并气胸患者采用微创胸闭式引流,效果显著,值得推广。
Objective Minimally invasive type of closed chest drainage curative effect for the treatment of copd with pneumothorax. Methods Convenient select 70 cases in March 2014 to March 2015 our hospital receives patients with copd with pneumothorax, its according to different treatment can be divided into control group and experimental group, two groups of lines of conventional chest and minimally invasive thoracic cavity closed drainage is closed drainage device, to observe the curative effect of the two groups. Results Experimental group cure rate is in accord with the control group（P〉0.05）, but the operation time, lung after a time, length of hospital stay, time of chest pain is obviously less than control group（P〈0.05）, adverse reaction rate, pain score significantly lower than the control group（P〈0.05）.The difference was scatistically significant. Conclusion Copd with pneumothorax were treated by minimally invasive thoracic closed drainage, obvious effect, is worth promoting
出处
《中外医疗》
2016年第21期82-83,86,共3页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词
气胸
微创式胸腔闭式引流术
慢阻肺
Pneumothorax
Minimally invasive type chest closed drainage
Copd
