期刊文献+

财政分权与地区社会保障服务绩效——基于空间计量的实证分析 被引量:5

Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Social Security Performance:Empirical Analysis Based on Spatial Econometrics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 财政分权如何更好地满足地区居民的需要和期待已经成为学术界研究的重要方向,地区居民对公共产品(服务)的需要和期待中,社会保障或社会福利方面的满足程度是最为重要和最引人关注的。笔者通过构建社会保障绩效评价指标体系,并用我国2001—2012年各省份数据计算社会保险绩效得分,再进行空间计量分析,发现:(1)财政收入分权与地区社会保险绩效有明显的负相关关系,而财政支出分权对地区社会保险绩效影响不明显;(2)65岁以上人口占比、社会平均工资水平与社会保险绩效明显正相关,农业人口占比与社会保险绩效明显负相关;(3)失业率、净移民率对社会保险绩效有一定的正面影响。最后,从明确中央与地方政府在社会保障事业中的收支责任。 How fiscal decentralization is tailored to the needs and wants of the individuals living in any given region is popular research direction. The satisfaction of social security or social welfare is the most important needs and wants of residents. By constructing performance evaluation system of social insurance, and using 2001-2012 social insurance data to calculate the social insurance performance evaluation score of the provinces in China,and then constructing contiguity matrix,inverse distance matrix and economic matrix as spatial weight matrix to conduct spatial econometric analysis,we found the following results:( 1) Fiscal revenue decentralization and regional social insurance performance have significant negative correlation,however,the coefficient is very small,but fiscal expenditure decentralization has not obvious influence on regional social insurance performance.( 2) Both percentage of people aged 65 to regional total population and local social average wage level have significantly positive correlation with regional social insurance performance,and percentage of agricultural population to regional total population has significantly negative correlation with regional social insurance performance.( 3) The unemployment rate and the net migration rate have positive influence on regional social insurance performance.
作者 彭锻炼
出处 《中央财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第8期25-33,共9页 Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics
基金 上海市教委科研创新项目"财政分权与地方政府社会保障服务绩效"(项目编号:13YS112) 上海立信会计学院科研项目"财政分权与地区社会保障绩效"(项目编号:1132IA1307)
关键词 财政分权 社会保障 绩效评价 空间计量分析 Fiscal decentralization Social security Performance evaluation Spatial econometric analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Iimi A. Decentralization and Economic Growth Revisited: An Empirical Note [J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2005, 57 (3) : 449 -461. 被引量:1
  • 2Rodriguez-Pose A, Ezcurra R. Is Fiscal Decentralization Harmful for Economic Growth? Evidence from the OECD Countries [J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2011, 11 (5): 619-643. 被引量:1
  • 3Lessmann C. Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Disparity: Evidence from Cross-section and Panel Data [ J ]. Environment and Planning A, 2009, 41 (10) : 2455 -2473. 被引量:1
  • 4Rodriguez-Pose A, Ezcurra R. Does Decentralization Matter for Regional Disparities? A Cross-country Analysis [ J ]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2010, 10 (5): 619-644. 被引量:1
  • 5Diaz-Serrano L, Rodriguez-Pose A. Decentralization and the Welfare State: What Do Citizens Perceive? [R]. Social Indicators Research, DOI 10. 1007/s11205 -014 -0599 -5, 2014. 被引量:1
  • 6Faguet J-P. Does Decentralization Increase Government Responsiveness to Local Needs?: Evidence from Bolivia [ J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2004, 88 (304) : 867 - 893. 被引量:1
  • 7Diaz-Serrano L, Meix-Llop E. Do Fiscal and Political Decentralization Raise Students' Perfor-manee? A Cross Country Analysis [ R]. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 6722, 2012. 被引量:1
  • 8Robalino D A, Picazo O F, Voetherg A. Does Fiscal Decentralization Improve Health Outcomes? Evidence from a Cross-Country Analysis [ R]. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 2565, 2001. 被引量:1
  • 9Uchimura H, Jutting J P. Fiscal Decentralization, Chinese Style: Good for Health Outcomes? [J]. World Development, 2009, 37 (12) : 1926 - 1934. 被引量:1
  • 10Adam A, Delis M D, Kamma P. Fiscal Decentralization and Public Sector Efficiency: Evidence from OECD Countries [J]. Economic Gover- nace. 2014, 15: 17-49. 被引量:1

二级参考文献79

共引文献185

同被引文献78

引证文献5

二级引证文献215

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部