摘要
保障性住房能够改善受保障对象的居住水平和生活质量,具有明显的社会效益;但城市政府供给保障房用地也意味着损失较多的土地出让收入(较高的机会成本)。保障房的合理选址有赖于对上述社会效益和土地机会成本的理性权衡,这需要基于城市低收入和中高收入居民的居住选址偏好,寻找那些相对于中高收入居民而言,低收入居民更为偏好的区位,这样的区位意味着较高的社会效益和较低的机会成本。本文在北京市1911个微观区块尺度上,以2010年北京市城市居民家庭调查的大样本微观数据为基础,应用显示性偏好法(Hedonic模型)分析了两类群体的选址偏好差异,量化了他们对各个区块的综合支付意愿水平并进行比较,建立并计算了北京市内不同区位的保障房选址适宜性指数。本研究能够为保障房选址决策提供技术支撑,有助于兼顾保障房社会效益和土地出让收入的财政约束。
Affordable housing has significant social benefits for improving its target group＇s quality of life. However,it also results in the loss of land transfer revenues（ a lot of opportunity costs） for urban governments. The reasonable site selection of affordable housing projects depends on a rational tradeoff between these social benefits and opportunity cost of land supply. This requires deep insights into the preferences of residential location choice for both low-income and high-income residents,looking for the locations low-income residents are more preferred relatively,where means higher social benefits and lower opportunity cost. In this paper,we quantify their differences in residential location choice preferences on the basis of a large sample micro data from 2010 Beijing Urban Household Survey,using revealed preference method（ Hedonic model）. Our analysis units are the 1911 traffic analysis zones（ TAZ） of Beijing,by comparing these two groups of people＇s overall willingness to pay for each TAZ,we construct an indicator for affordable housing site selection at different locations. This research can provide technical support for the affordable housing projects＇ site selection decisions,and contribute to the balance of both social benefits from affordable housing and the financial constraints of urban governments.
出处
《管理评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第7期3-11,共9页
Management Review
基金
国家自然科学基金面上项目(71273154)
国家自然科学基金优秀青年基金项目(71322307)
国家自然科学基金重点项目(71533004)
国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0502804)
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(BLX2015-40)
关键词
保障房选址
居住选址
显示性偏好法
HEDONIC模型
支付意愿
affordable housing projects＇ site selection
residential location choice
revealed preference
Hedonic model
willingness to pay
