摘要
受西方学术影响,中国哲学史研究自新文化运动以来采取了"观念先行"的治学原则。人们用某种观念统辖中国哲学文献,呈现了一种与中国人的生存和思想若即若离的中国哲学史述说。胡适的史料批判法、冯友兰的逻辑分析法、陈寅恪所谓"了解之同情",确立了这种哲学史研究的最初范式。中国哲学史研究方法需进一步与中国传统阅读习惯接轨,陆九渊所谓"六经注我"典型地表达了这种传统读书经验。对文本诠释这个活动进行生存分析发现:阅读是在问题意识、情感倾向和概念体系中进行的,哲学史研究需充分顾及读者和文本之间的情感思想纽带。
Driven by the May Fourth movement,Chinese scholars began to study the history of Chinese philosophy with a so-called'ideology first'method.That is,scholars have to establish an ideology first and then apply it to arranging the historical texts of philosophy.As a result,they present various studies of history of Chinese philosophy without Chinese existential concerns,such as Hu Shi's method of textual critics,Feng Youlan's logical analysis,and Chen Yingke's understanding in sympathy.However,to establish a solid study of the history of Chinese philosophy,the author wants to emphasize the need that the traditional reading pattern in Chinese thinkers must be followed.In my point of view,Lu Jiuyuan's statement that'the ancient scriptures are footnotes of my thought'must be seriously reviewed to penetrate into this reading pattern.Indeed,textual hermeneutics is an existential analysis,that is,reading is an activity within concerns,propositions of feelings,and conceptual framework.In this regard,studies of the history of philosophy must deal with the interactions of feeling and thinking which occur between the reader and the text.
出处
《文史哲》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第4期53-65,164-165,共13页
Literature,History,and Philosophy
