期刊文献+

3.0T磁共振DWI联合动态增强扫描在唾液腺肿瘤中的诊断价值 被引量:7

Diagnostic value of DWI combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of salivary gland tumor on 3.0T MR
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨3.0T磁共振扩散加权成像联合动态增强磁共振成像对唾液腺肿瘤的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析37例唾液腺肿瘤患者的临床和MRI资料,所有患者均经穿刺活检或手术病理证实,观察病灶形态、边界、包膜、T1WI及T2WI信号特征,并测量分析病变的ADC值和TIC曲线。结果唾液腺多形性腺瘤的ADC值(1.75±0.32×10^(-3)mm^2/s)、唾液腺腺淋巴瘤的ADC值(0.78±0.09×10^(-3)mm^2/s)和恶性肿瘤的ADC值(1.12±0.21×10^(-3)mm^2/s)三者之间均存在统计学差异,唾液腺良性肿瘤与恶性肿瘤的ADC值分别为(1.32±0.57×10^(-3)mm^2/s)和(1.12±0.21×10^(-3)mm^2/s),两者无明显差异,腺淋巴瘤与恶性肿瘤的ADC阈值为0.83×10^(-3)mm^2/s,多形性腺瘤和恶性肿瘤的ADC阈值为1.38×10^(-3)mm^2/s;37例唾液腺肿瘤中,11例表现A型曲线,15例表现为B型曲线,10例表现为C型曲线,淋巴管瘤表现为D型曲线,腺淋巴瘤的Tpeak值(22.7±11.7)s与恶性肿瘤的Tpeak值(43.2±14.1)s之间存在统计学差异(P<0.01),腺淋巴瘤峰值时间早于恶性肿瘤;腺淋巴瘤廓清率(58.5%±7.4)高于恶性肿瘤廓清率(18.2%±12.1)(P<0.01),根据TIC曲线类型,其诊断的敏感性、特异性、准确率、阳性预测值及阴性预测值分别为88.9%、80%、86.5%、92.3%、72.7%;对于B型和C型曲线采用ADC值进行修正诊断后,各值分别为92.5%、90%、91.9%、96.2%、81.8%。结论磁共振ADC值和TIC曲线有助于唾液腺肿瘤性病变的诊断,TIC曲线表现为B型或C型时,联合应用ADC值有利于提高唾液腺肿瘤的定性诊断。 Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of DWI combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of salivary gland tumor on 3.0T MR. Methods Thirty-seven cases of salivary gland tumors were all confirmed by biopsy or surgical pathology. Clinical materials as well as MRI were analyzed retrospectively. Emphasis was placed on the lesion morphology, borders, capsule signal intensity characteristics, ADC values and TIC types. Results The ADC values of pleomorphic adenomas ( 1.75 ± 0.32 × 10^-3 mm2/s), adenolymphoma (0.78 ±0.09 × 10^-3 mm2/s) and malignant tumors ( 1.12 ±0.21 × 10^-3 mm2/s) were significantly significant. The ADC values between benign and malignant tumors of the salivary gland were not significanly different. The ADC value threshold between adenolymphoma and malignancies was 0.83 × 10^-3 mm2/s, and pleomorphic adenomas and carcinomas was 1.38 × 10^-3 mm2/s; Eleven cases' TIC were type A, 15 cases were type B, 10 cases were type C, lymphangioma was type D. There were significant differences between the Tpeak values of gland lymphoma ( 22.7 ± 11.7 ) s and malignancy (43.2 ± 14.1 ) s ( P 〈 0.01 ). Adenolymphoma washout rate (58.5% ± 7.4) was higher than malignant tumors ( 18.2% ± 12. 1 ) ( P 〈0.01 ). Taking the TIC type A, B and D as benign, the type C as malignant, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive values were 88.9% , 80% , 86.5% , 92.3% , 72.7% , and Taking TIC type B and C combined with ADC value, the values were 92.5% , 90%, 91.9% , 96.2% , 81.8%. Conclusion ADC value and TIC types were useful in the diagnosis of salivary gland tumors. The combination of ADC values and TIC curve would improve the qualitative diagnosis when the TIC type was B or C.
出处 《医学影像学杂志》 2016年第7期1193-1198,共6页 Journal of Medical Imaging
关键词 唾液腺肿瘤 磁共振成像 动态增强 扩张散加权成像 Salivary gland tumor Magnetic resonance imaging Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging Diffusion-weighted imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献58

  • 1陈祖华,周任务,姚渭土,夏建余,郑双丽.腮腺腺淋巴瘤的CT、MRI表现[J].放射学实践,2007,22(1):31-33. 被引量:21
  • 2余强,王平仲,石慧敏,罗济程.口腔颌面部恶性肿瘤单体素氢质子磁共振波谱的初步研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2007,42(1):18-20. 被引量:8
  • 3Takashima S, Wang J, Takayama F, et al. Parotid masses: prediction of malignancy using magnetization transfer and MR imaging findings [J]. AJR, 2001,176: 577. 被引量:1
  • 4Hidetake Y, Tatsuro F, Tsuyoshi T, et al. Salivary gland tumors: diagnostic value of gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging with histopathologic correlation[J]. Radiology,2003,226:345 - 354. 被引量:1
  • 5Miki H, Jun-ichi A, Yoshinobu Y, et al. Diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the salivary gland tumors[J]. Oral Oncology, 2007,43:940-947. 被引量:1
  • 6Jose C, Varghese FT. A prospective comparative study of MRI sialography and conventional sialography of salivary duet disease [ J ]. AJR, 1999,173:1497 - 1503. 被引量:1
  • 7Astreinidou E, Raaymakers CP, Roesink JM,et al. 3D MR sialography protocol for postradiotherapy follow-up of the salivary duct system[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2006,24:556 - 562. 被引量:1
  • 8Morimoto Y,Tanaka T, Tominaga K,et al. Clinical application of magnetic resonance sialqgraphic 3-dimensional reconstruction imaging and magnetic resonance virtual endoscopy for salivary gland duct analysis [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2004,62:1237 - 1245. 被引量:1
  • 9Ann DK, David KW, Yeung AT,et al. Salivary gland tumors at in vivo proton MR spectroscopy[J]. Radiology,2005,237:563 - 569. 被引量:1
  • 10Yousem DM, Kraut MA, Chalian AA. Major salivary gland imaging[J]. Radiology, 2000, 216:19 29. 被引量:1

共引文献42

同被引文献74

引证文献7

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部