期刊文献+

2003年至2012年河北医科大学第三医院成人骨盆骨折的流行病学研究 被引量:8

Epidemiological survey of adult pelvic fractures in The Third Affiliated Hospital to Hebei Medical University from 2003 through 2012
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨10年期间河北医科大学第三医院成人骨盆骨折流行病学特征及变化趋势。方法回顾性分析2003年1月至2012年12月期间河北医科大学第三医院收治的骨盆骨折患者资料,记录患者的性别、年龄、骨折AO分型及Young.Burgess分型等。将2003年1月至2007年12月的患者资料定为A组,2008年1月至2012年12月的患者资料定为B组,比较两组患者的一般资料,总结10年期间成人骨盆骨折的流行病学特征及变化趋势。结果共统计4161例骨盆骨折,占同期成人骨盆与髋臼骨折的80.31%(4161/5181),占同期成人全身骨折的3.87%(4161/107648)。男1932例,女2229例,男女比为1:1.15;骨折高发年龄段为31.40岁;骨折高发类型:AO分型为61-A型,Young-Burgess分型为Lc型。A组成人骨盆骨折1847例,男女比为1:1.01;平均年龄40.9岁。B组2314例,男女比为1:1.28;平均年龄44.0岁。两组眭别构成比和年龄分布比较差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。两组均是青年(16—40岁)最多,中年(41~60岁)次之,老年(〉61岁)最少,三组间两两比较差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。两组AO高发骨折分型均为61.A型,61.B型次之,61-C型最少,其中均以61-A2亚型最多。A组Young—Burgess高发骨折分型为APC型,B组为LC型。结论成人骨盆骨折高发年龄段为31~40岁,女性多于男性,骨盆骨折类型以A0分型61-A型为主,Young—Burgess分型以LC型为主。与前5年相比,后5年患者年龄,女性患者及LC型骨折呈增加趋势。 Objective To analyze the epidemiological features and trends of adult pelvic fractures in The Third Affiliated Hospital to Hebei Medical University from 2003 through 2012. Methods The data of adult pelvic fractures from January 2003 through December 2012 at our hospital were collected though the PACS system and the case reeords review system. The data between 2003 and 2007 were assigned into group A and those between 2008 and 2012 into group B. The 2 groups were compared in terms of gender, age, age distribution, type of AO classification and type of Young-Burgess classification. Results A total of 4, 161 adult pelvic fractures were collected, accounting for 80. 31% (4, 161/5, 181) of adult pelvic ring and ae- etabular fractures and 3.87% (4, 161/107,648) of adult fractures during the same period. They involved 1,932 males and 2,229 females, giving a male/female ratio of 1: 1.15. The fractures peaked at an age range from 31 to 40 years. The most common fractures were type 61-A2 by AO classification and type LC by Young-Burgess classification. In group A, there were 1,847 cases, with a male/female ratio of 1:1.01 and an average age of 40. 9 years. In group B, there were 2, 314 cases, with a male/female ratio of 1:1.28 and an average age of 44.0 years. There were significant differences between the 2 groups in male/female ratioand average age ( P 〈 0. 05). In both groups, young patients (from 16 to 40 years) were the most, followed by the middle-aged ones (from 41 to 60 years) and the senior ( 〉 60 years), showing a significant difference between any 2 of the 3 age groups ( P 〈 0. 05). By AO classification, the high-risk type of fracture was 61-A in both groups, followed by type 61-B and type 61-C, with the subtype 61-A2 the most predominant. By Young-Burgess classification, the high-risk type of fracture was type APC in group A and type LC in group B. Conclusions The peak age of adult pelvic fractures was from 31 to 40 years. There were more female patients than male ones.
出处 《中华创伤骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第7期607-611,共5页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
关键词 骨盆骨折 流行病学 性别分布 年龄分布 Pelvic fractures Epidemiology Sex distribution Age distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Balogh Z, King KL, Mackay P, et al. The epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures: a population-based study[J]. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2007, 63(5): 1066-1073. DOI: 10. 1097/TA. 0bO13e 3181589fa4. 被引量:1
  • 2Petrisor BA, Bhandari M. Injuries to the pelvic ring: Incidence, classification, associated injuries and mortality rates [J] . Current Orthopaedics, 2005, 19(5): 327-333. DO1: 10. 1016/j. cuor. 2005. 06. 006. 被引量:1
  • 3Zhang Y. Clinical epidemiology of orthopedic trauma [M] . NewYork: Thieme, 2012, 335. 被引量:1
  • 4张英泽编著..临床创伤骨科流行病学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:592.
  • 5Wong JM, Bucknill A. Fractures of the pelvic ring[J]. Injury, 2013, pii: S002-1383(13)00556-1. DOI: 10. 1016/j. injury. 2013.11. 021. 被引量:1
  • 6Martin S, Tomas P. Pelvic ring injuries: current concepts of man- agement [J]. Cas Lek Cesk, 2011, 150(8): 433-437. 被引量:1
  • 7Stambaugh LE, Blackmore CC. Pelvic ring disruptions in emergency radiology [J]. European Joumal of Radiology, 2003, 48 ( 1 ) : 71-87. DOI: 10. 1016/S0720-048X(03)00208-0. 被引量:1
  • 8Davarinos N, Ellanti P, Morris S, et al. Epidemiology of pelvic and acetabular trauma in a Dublin tertiary hospital: a 10-year experience [J] . Irish Journal of Medical Science, 2012, 181(2): 243-246. DOI: 10. 1007/s11845-011-0791-4. 被引量:1
  • 9Yang NP, Chan CL, Chu D, et al. Epidemiology of hospitalized traumatic pelvic fractures and their combined injuries in taiwan: 2000-2011 National Health Insurance Data Surveillance [J] . BioMed Research International, 2014, 2014. DOI: 10. 1155/2014/878601. 被引量:1
  • 10Chien LC, Cheng HM, Chen WC, et al. Pelvic fracture and risk factors for mortality: a population-based study in Taiwan [J]. Euro-pean Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2010, 36(2): 131-137. DOI: 10. 1007/s00068-009-9094-0. 被引量:1

二级参考文献64

  • 1罗先正,王宝军,任素梅.双能量X线骨密度仪用于老年髋部骨折的风险预测[J].中华骨科杂志,1995,15(5):263-265. 被引量:16
  • 2姚远,周继红,刘大维,邱俊,朱佩芳.创伤数据库的研制[J].医疗设备信息,2007,22(2):20-22. 被引量:12
  • 3Pohlemann T, Richter M, Otte D, et al. Mechanism of pelvic girdle injuries in street traffic. Medical-technical accident analysis. Unfallchirurg, 2000, 103: 267-274. 被引量:1
  • 4Keegan TH, Kelsey JL, King AC, et al. Characteristics of fallers who fracture at the foot, distal forearm, proximal humerus, pelvis, and shaft of the tibia/fibula compared with fallers who do not fracture. Am J Epidemiol JT, 2004, 159: 192-203. 被引量:1
  • 5Boufous S, Finch C, Lord S, et al. The increasing burden of pelvic fractures in older people, New South Wales, Australia. Injury, 2005, 36: 1323-1329. 被引量:1
  • 6Dominguez S, Liu P, Roberts C, et al. Prevalence of traumatic hip and pelvic fractures in patients with suspected hip fracture and negative initial standard radiographs-a study of emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med, 2005, 12: 366-369. 被引量:1
  • 7Ruchholtz S, Waydhas C, Lewan U, et al. Free abdominal fluid on ultrasound in unstable pelvic ring fracture: is laparotomy always necessary? J Trauma, 2004, 57: 278-287. 被引量:1
  • 8Sarln EL, Moore JB, Moore EE, et al. Pelvic fracture pattern does not always predict the need for urgent embolization. J Trauma, 2005, 58: 973-977. 被引量:1
  • 9Eastridge B J, Starr A, Minei JP, et al. The importance of fracture pattern in guiding therapeutic decision-making in patients with hemorrhagic shock and pelvic ring disruptions. JTrauma, 2002,53:446-451. 被引量:1
  • 10Wong YC, Wang LJ, Ng C J, et al. Mortality after successful transcatheter arterial embolization in patients with unstable pelvic fractures: rate of blood transfusion as a predictive factor. J Trauma, 2000, 49:. 71-75. 被引量:1

共引文献39

同被引文献49

引证文献8

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部