期刊文献+

肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效分析 被引量:3

Analysis on the Clinical Efficacy of Locking Proximal Humeral Plate in Treatment of Senile Proximal Humerus Fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的临床效果。方法选取2009年1月至2015年12月我院收治的老年肱骨近端骨折患者92例患者作为研究对象,按照入院顺序将其分为观察组和对照组,每组各46例。对照组采用常规的钢板手术进行治疗,观察组采用肱骨近端钢板锁定治疗。比较两组的临床治疗效果、Neer功能评分、手术时长、术中出血量以及骨折愈合时间。结果两组患者的手术时长无明显差异(P>0.05),观察组患者的手术出血量、骨折愈合时间均显著少于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患者的Neer各项评分以及总分均显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组的治疗总有效率为91.3%,明显高于对照组的71.7%(P<0.05)。结论肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗能够显著改善老年肱骨近端骨折患者的治疗效果,还可以优化临床治疗相关指标,值得推广应用。 Objective To explore the clinical effect of locking proximal humeral plate in treatment of senile proximal humerus fractures. Methods From January 2009 to D ecember 201 5, 92 cases of elderly patients with proximal humerus fractures treated in our hospital were selected and divided into observation group and control group according to the admission sequence, with 46 cases in each group. The control group was treated with conventional plate surgery, the observation group was treated with locking proximal humeral plate. The clinical effects, Neer function scores, operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, healing time of fracture in two groups were compared. Results The operation time of two groups had no statistical difference(P〉0.05); the intraoperative bleeding volume, healing time of fracture in observation group were significantly less than those in control group(P〉0.05). The each items scores and total scores of Neer in observation group were significantly better than those in control group(P〈0.05). The total effective rate of observation group was91.3%, significantly higher than 71.7% of control group(P〈0.05). Conclusions L ocking proximal humeral plate in treatment of senile proximal humerus fractures can significantly improve the treatment effects, and optimize the clinical related indicators, which is worthy of promotion and application.
出处 《临床医学工程》 2016年第7期889-890,共2页 Clinical Medicine & Engineering
关键词 老年肱骨近端骨折 锁定钢板治疗 疗效分析 Senile proximal humerus fracture Locking plate treatment Curative effect analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献48

  • 1王亦璁.骨与关节损伤[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:760. 被引量:44
  • 2徐又佳,郑祖根,汪益,俞晨,言湛军,周晓中,周海斌,董启榕.肱骨近端解剖钢板在骨折治疗中的结构特点[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(16):1214-1217. 被引量:4
  • 3胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎.实用骨科学[M].4版.北京:人民军医出版社,2012:608. 被引量:192
  • 4Smith AM, Mardones RM, Sperling J-W, et a/. Early complications of operatively treated proximal humeral fractures[ J ]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2007,1:14 -24. 被引量:1
  • 5Gierer P, Simon C, Gradl G, et al. Complex proximal humerus frac-tures-management with a humeral head prosthesis? Clinical and ra- diological results of a prospective study [ J ]. Orthopade, 2006,8 : 834 - 840. 被引量:1
  • 6Mehlhor AT, Schmalh A, Sudkamp NP. Clinical evaluation of a new custom offsets shoulder prosthesis for treatment of complex fractures of the proximal humerus[ J]. Acta Orthop Belg,2006 ,72 :387 -394. 被引量:1
  • 7Mumcbovsky J, Ikemoto RY, Nascimento LG, et o2. Peetoralis major tendon reference (PMT) :a new method for accurate restoration of hu- meral length with hemianhmplasty for fracture[ J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2006,6:675 -678. 被引量:1
  • 8Antufia SA, Speding JW, Cofield RH. Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for acute fractures of the proximal humerus:a minimum five-year follow- up [ J ]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2008,2:202 - 209. 被引量:1
  • 9Neer CS 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures:part I. Classi- fication and evaluation. 1970[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2006, (442) : 77-82. 被引量:1
  • 10Imarisio D,Trecci A,Sabatini L,et al. Treatment for proximal humeral fractures with percutaneous plating:our first results [J]. Musculoskelet Surg, 2013,97 (Suppl 1 ) : 85-91. 被引量:1

共引文献166

同被引文献21

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部