期刊文献+

程序公正补偿性效应的有限性及其对人力资源管理的启示

下载PDF
导出
摘要 早期研究者们均认为程序公正和结果宜人性之间存在着显著的交互作用,即程序公正会缓解不利结果带来的消极影响。这种交互作用被称作"程序公正的补偿性效应"。但是,随着近几年来的进一步探究发现,程序公正的补偿性效应存在有限性。基于此,本文对程序公正与结果宜人性的关系研究进行了回顾梳理,着重探讨程序公正补偿性效应的影响因素,包括信任、个体的地位、关系的重要性、个体的调节焦点倾向、自我不确定感及个体的自我建构水平等,并提出未来研究方向和促进程序公正补偿性效应的人力资源管理策略。 In the early stage, researchers have agreed that procedural justice interacts with outcome favorability to affect people's beliefs and behaviors. Procedural justice attenuates the negative influence of the unfavorable results. This interaction is called "compensatory effect of procedural justice." However, with further exploration in recent years, researchers have found that the compensatory effect of the procedural justice is limited. Based on this, this research first reviews literatures on the relationship between procedural justice and outcome favorability. Then it focuses on the factors influencing the compensatory effect of procedural justice, including trust, individual status, the importance of relationship, individual regulatory focus, uncertainty, and self-construction. Finally, future research directions and the strategy of human resources management arc discussed.
作者 刘伟 吴玄娜
出处 《企业经济》 北大核心 2016年第7期97-104,共8页 Enterprise Economy
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"程序公正与权威信任:公共政策可接受性机制"(项目编号:71401113)
关键词 程序公正的补偿性效应 情境变量 个体变量 人力资源管理 compensatory effect of procedural justice situational variables individual variables human resource management
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Thibaut,J.W. andWalker, L.Procedural justice'A psycho- logical analysis[M].NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum,1975:l-10. 被引量:1
  • 2Brockner,J. and Wie~enfeld,B. An integrative framework for explaining reactions to ,decisions: the interactive effects of outcomes and procedures [J]. Psychological Bulletin,1996,120 (2) : 189-208. 被引量:1
  • 3De Cremer, D., and Knippenberg,D.V.Cooperation with leaders in social dilemmas:On the effects of procedural fairness and outcome favorability in structural cooperation[J].Organiza- tional Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2003,91 (1):1- 11. 被引量:1
  • 4Magner, N. R.,Rahman, M., and Welker, R. B.The inter- active effect of outcome favorability and procedural justice in work resource allocation on work performance[J]. Journal of Ap- plied Social Psychology, 1996, 26(9):825-842. 被引量:1
  • 5Chen,Y. R., Brockner,J., and Greenberg,J.When is it"a pleasure to do business with you?"the effects of relative status, outcome favorability, and procedural fairness [J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2003, 92(1): 1-21. 被引量:1
  • 6Kwong,J.Y.Y., and Leung,K.A moderation of the inter- action effect of procedure justice and outcome favorability: Im- portance of the relationship[J].Organizational Behavior and Hu- man Decision Process, 2002,,87(2):278-299. 被引量:1
  • 7Schroth,H., and Shah,P. Procedures,do we really want to know them?[J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000,85 (3):462 -471. 被引量:1
  • 8Holmvall,C.M., and Bobocel,D.R.What fair procedures say about me: self-construals and reactionsto procedural fair- ness[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2008,105(1): 147-168. 被引量:1
  • 9Tyler,T.R., and Caine,A.The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders[J]. Journal of Per- sonality and Social Psychology, 1981,41 (4):642 - 655. 被引量:1
  • 10Brockner,J.,De Cremer, D., FIishman,A.Y., and Spiegel, S.When does high procedural fairness reduce self-evaluations following unfavorable outcomes?The moderating effect of pre- vention focus [J].Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2008,44(2): 187-200. 被引量:1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部