摘要
对于刑法因果关系的认定问题,无论在理论上采取何种立场,都不得无视当下中国的刑事司法语境。本文围绕相当因果关系说,对其理论沿革进行了梳理,且基于对十个近年典型性刑事判决的实证考察,揭示了以相当说为中心的因果关系理论的实务适用现状。即法院在选取因果关系认定标准时,存在单纯适用相当说、条件说与相当说共用、以条件说替代相当说三种情况。并据此认为,以相当说为中心重构我国刑法因果关系的认定理论,不仅在理论上具有一定的合理性,在实践中也获得了相当的现实支撑。
For the determination of the causal relationship in criminal law,no matter what positions they take,the identification of the cause can not be separated from the current Chinese criminal judicial environment. In this paper,the authors focus on the theory evolution of the Relative Causality,basing on the empirical investigation of criminal cases in nearly ten years.Revealing the practical application of the theory in causal relationship which mainly center on the equivalent theory. When selecting the standard of causality,the court have three kinds of situations： the Equivalent only,together with the Equivalent and Condition,and Condition substitute with Equivalent. According to this,using the equivalent theory to reconstruct the cognizance causality theory in criminal law in China are not only reasonable in theory but also has considerable practical support.
出处
《河南财经政法大学学报》
2016年第4期105-113,共9页
Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基金
教育部2011年人文社会科学研究青年基金项目<风险社会中事故型犯罪的监督过失研究>(11YJC820136)
关键词
因果关系
相当因果关系说
条件说
实证考察
causal relationship
Theory of Correspond Causality
Conditioning Theory
empirical study
