摘要
目的:比较临床药师与住院医师对最佳用药史采集的完整性。方法:纳入2015年5-11月期间入住某院神经内科的100名患者,分别由临床药师与住院医师对这100名患者进行用药史信息的采集,比较信息采集的完整性并评价其可能导致的潜在风险并分析原因。结果:临床药师在用药品种、药品剂型、用药依从性方面的信息采集的完整性优于住院医师,两组之间比较具有显著性差异(P<0.05),但在用法用量、过敏史及不良反应史方面的信息采集完整性方面,两组比较没有统计学差异(P>0.05),两组的最佳用药史采集均存在不完整性,都有可能导致患者潜在的不适或临床症状恶化的风险。结论:患者最佳用药史采集的完整可减少药物差异及潜在的用药风险,临床药师及住院医师在这方面均需加强,尽可能多地获取准确完整的用药信息。
OBJECTIVE To compare clinical pharmacists and resident physicians for integrity of preferred drug history collection.METHODS From May 2015 to November 2015,drug histories of 100 patients admitted to department of neurology were collected respectively by clinical pharmacists and resident physicians to compare integrity of information collection and evaluate whether it could lead to potential risks and analyze the reasons.RESULTS Clinical pharmacists were superior to resident physicians in collecting drug category,dosage form and medication compliance（P〈0.05）.No statistical difference was observed in integrity of usage and dosage,allergic history and adverse reactions（P〉0.05）.Two groups all might collect incomplete medication history,and all might result in potential risks of deterioration of patient discomfort or clinical symptoms.CONCLUSION Integrity of patient history collected the best medication can reduce drug differences and potential risks of medication.Clinical pharmacist and resident physicians should be promoted in this regard to obtain accurate and complete drug information.
出处
《中国医院药学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2016年第13期1125-1128,共4页
Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
关键词
最佳用药史
临床药师
住院医师
best possible medication history
clinical pharmacists
resident physicians
