摘要
"认知资本主义"对于汉语学术界尚缺乏深入的研究,这不利于人们对资本主义转型的深入理解,更不能准确地勘定哈特、奈格里等人的激进政治理论。从谱系学上来讲,西美尔、韦伯、哈耶克,特别是马克思在文本上均给出不同程度的预见性论述。如果从其内在特质的视角看,博当曾经以"十五条纲领"的方式作了概括。以此为背景,哈特、奈格里等人着重阐释了"非物质劳动"、"诸众"与"生命政治"。为了反思这样一种理论建构,我们将之置放到政治经济学批判语境,便可以看到:认知资本主义并未能够否定"劳动价值论";认知资本主义并未能改变资本主义剥削关系的本质,也就是说没有改变劳资关系,以及基于认知资本主义的抵抗策略在"历史的本质性的一度中"低于历史唯物主义的革命方案。
For Chinese academics, "cognitive capitalism" is still not touched deeply, which is disadvantageous for us to make further understandings for the transition of capitalism and examination for the radical political theories such as Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri's. In terms of genealogy, Georg Simmel, Max Weber, Hayek, especially Marx have offered anticipatory discussions on their texts. If in the perspectives of inner characteristics, Boutang has summarized them as "Fifteen Guidelines". In this context, Hart and Negri emphasized the "immaterial labor", "multitudes" and "bio-politics". In order to reflect on this theoretical construction, we should put it into the context of political-economics to clarify that cognitive capitalism is unable to deny the "labor theory of value" and transmit the substance of exploitive relations of capitalism. That is to say, it may still not change the relationship between labor and capital. In this sense, all resistant strategies based on cognitive capitalism are inferior to revolutionary approaches of historical materialism.
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第7期136-143,共8页
Journal of Social Sciences
基金
中国博士后基金项目"马克思拜物教批判语境中的政治哲学向度"(项目编号:2015M571741)
国家留学基金委项目"马克思与黑格尔思想传承关系研究"(项目编号:CSCNO.201506145011)的阶段性成果
关键词
认知资本主义
谱系
特质
批判
历史唯物主义
Cognitive Capitalism
Hierarchy
Characteristics
Critique
Historical Materialism