摘要
目的以Cortisomol糊剂为对照,评价iRoot SP糊剂用于根管充填的近远期临床疗效,为临床推广使用提供参考依据。方法选取120颗临床诊断为慢性牙髓炎或慢性根尖周炎的恒牙随机分为2组,每组60颗,分别使用iRoot SP和Cortisomol糊剂配合牙胶尖进行充填,比较两组术后7 d疼痛反应,3个月和2年的临床疗效。结果 iRoot SP和Cortisomol糊剂治疗后7 d的疼痛反应均较轻(P>0.05),3个月后治疗成功率分别为94.83%和96.67%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),2年后iRoot SP糊剂的治疗成功率(93.10%)明显高于Cortisomol组(80.70%),两组有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论 iRoot SP糊剂和Cortisomol糊剂都可以显著减少术后近期疼痛反应,远期疗效iRoot SP糊剂优于Cortisomol糊剂,可在临床上推广应用。
Objective To evaluate the recent treatment response and long-term clinical effect of root canal filling with iRoot SP sealer and compare it with root canal filling with Cortisomol. Method 120 teeth suffering from chronic pulpitis or periapeial periodontitis were randomly divided into 2 groups, and filled respectively by iRoot SP or Cortisomol sealer combined with cold gutta-percha. The oc- currence of pain in 7 days after treatment was recorded and the therapeutic effects were evaluated in the following 3 months and 2 years. Results The occurrence rate of pain after root canal therapy in 7 days using iRoot SP and Cortisomol were both low （P〉0.05）. There was no statistical significance in success rate between iRoot SP and Cortisomol after 3 months （94.83% vs. 96.67%） （P〉0.05）. The success rate of treatment with iRoot SP （93.10%） after 2 years was significantly higher than that with Cortisomol sealer （80.70%） in root canal filling （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Both the treatment with iRoot SP sealer in root canal filling and with Cortisomol sealer can significantly reduce the postoperative pain. However, iRoot SP sealer shows better efinical treatment effects than Cortisomol in the long run and the former is worth wide application in clinc.
出处
《口腔医学》
CAS
2016年第6期532-535,共4页
Stomatology
基金
苏州市科技发展计划指导项目(SYSD2014094)
