摘要
《消费者权益保护法》第五十五条第二款规定的惩罚性赔偿不同于我国其他法律规范的相关规定,但对其理论关注不足,相关司法实践更是缺乏。该款中的"等"字应理解为除《消保法》第五十条之外的相关法律法规,"赔偿损失"和"所受损失"中的"损失"外延一致,包括除第五十条之外的人身损害、精神损害和财产损害。《消保法》修正前后的条文错位及对矫正正义的追求不应成为扩张或限缩惩罚性赔偿范围的理由。
The rule of punitive damages of Consumer Protection Law in Article 55, paragraph 2 is different from the relevant provisions of other laws and regulations, but the attention to the theory and relevant judicial practice are deficient. The ＂other＂ in the paragraph should be interpreted as the relevant laws and regulations except Consumer Protection Law Article 50, and the ‘losses＇ in ‘compensation losses＇ and ‘incurred losses＇ has the same meaning,including physiological damages, mental damages and property damages. The dislocation of Consumer Protection Law before and after correction and the pursuit of corrective justice should not be the reason to expand or limit the scope of punitive damages.
出处
《河南广播电视大学学报》
2016年第2期28-31,共4页
Journal of Henan Radio & TV University
关键词
消费者权益保护法
惩罚性赔偿
人格权
矫正正义
Consumer Protection Law
punitive damages
personality right
corrective justice
