摘要
财产保全错误是民事司法实践中较为常见的程序错误。对于财产保全错误事项,我国民事诉讼法仅规定了当事人申请错误应当向被申请人赔偿因保全所遭受的损失,但对基于法院自身原因造成财产保全错误是否应对当事人赔偿问题未予涉及。法院财产保全错误的发生,与财产保全程序主导主体异化以及财产保全程序运作流程略化等密切相关。然而,由于我国程序运行中的法院本位主义、实体正义导向的程序设置以及"终局判决规则"的僵化适用,使得现行立法中的复议、上诉以及再审等救济制度均无法有效解决法院财产保全错误问题。基于此,为确保当事人的诉讼权利得以及时救济,应当设置多元分层的程序救济制度、规范法院财产保全错误救济程序设置。
Property preservation errors are relatively common procedural errors in the practice of civil justice. For property preservation error cases, The Chinese Civil Procedure Law only provided that the parties shall compensate the respondents＇loss caused by errors in applying for property preservation, but there is no mentioning of whether the property preservation errors caused by the court shall lead to compensation for the parties involved. According to this paper, the incidence of property preservation errors are closely linked to the alienation of the subjects involved in the property preservation procedure and the simplification operation of property preservation. However, due to China＇s adherence to the court＇s departmentalism in processing procedures, substantive justice-oriented legislation as well as the rigidify of the ＂ uniform＂ procedure-setting rules, property preservation errors caused by court could not be effectively addressed by the existing relief systems, such as review, appeal and retrial. Therefore, in order to ensure the timely relief of parties litigation rights, a multi-layered procedural relief system should be established to fully protect the parties＂ rights of participation in procedures, and regulate the court＇s property preservation error relief system.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第8期178-189,共12页
Hebei Law Science
基金
国家社会科学基金项目<西方"立案登记"模式与中国民事诉讼受案程序改革研究>(15BFX064)
重庆市社会科学规划2014年度培育项目<民事诉讼中间上诉制度研究>(2014PY26)
重庆市法学会2014年法学研究重点课题<民事再审检察建议工作研究>(CFH2014B03)
关键词
法院财产保全错误
救济路径
法院本位主义
中间上诉
property preservation error caused by the court
relief paths
review
the court＇s departmentalism
interlocutory appeal
