摘要
目的对同一伤者分别使用《道路交通事故受伤人员伤残评定》（GB18667-2002）和《劳动能力鉴定职工工伤与职业病致残等级》（GB/T 16180-2006）进行伤残评定,比较伤残等级的差别。方法选取某鉴定所2007~2013年受理的道路交通事故致成人四肢长骨骨折的案例1036例,分别使用上述2种标准进行伤残等级评定,并根据骨折数、治疗情况、有无肢体功能障碍对评定结果进行列表比较。结果仅有骨折后行外固定治疗且留有肢体功能障碍的17例（占1.64%）伤残等级基本相同,其他差别较大。结论对同一伤者分别使用2种标准进行评定,伤残等级存在较大差别。
Objective For the same injured people to be respectively evaluated by ＂Assessment for body impairment of the injured in road traffic accident＂（GB18667-2002） and ＂Standard for identifying work ability： Gradation of disability caused by work-related injuries and occupation diseases＂（GB/T 16180-2006）, their disability degrees were compared to ascertain whether there exists difference in the results obtained from the two appraisals. Methods 1036 cases of adults, whose limb long bones suffered from fractures caused by traffic accidents, were collected, these cases happened from 2007 to 2013. With the evaluation by the above standards, the disability degree was obtained and compared along with the number of fractures, treatment situation and physical dysfunctions. Results Only 17 cases（1.64 %）, where the people still remained limb dysfunctions although having received the external fixation after being fractured, are basically of the same disability degree, but the others have greater differences. Conclusion There are somewhere greater differences to evaluate the disability degree with the respective application of the two standards above.
出处
《刑事技术》
2016年第3期192-194,共3页
Forensic Science and Technology
关键词
临床法医学
四肢长骨骨折
伤残等级
道路交通事故
clinical forensic medicine
limb long bone fracture
degree of disability
road traffic accident
