摘要
欧洲一体化曾被誉为发展程度最高的区域合作模式,是区域合作的典范。然而,欧洲主权债务危机、乌克兰危机及伴随其一直存在的道义问题揭示了欧洲一体化进程中的深刻挑战,同时,以欧洲发达市场所组成的区域合作路径虽然符合欧洲区情,但并不一定适用于世界其他地区,特别是发展中地区。因而,亚洲区域合作需要有自己的理论指导。欧洲的目标是建立政治联盟,主要是趋同过程,旨在从多元走向统一。亚洲的目标是建立共通的区域,主要是对接过程,旨在从多元走向共通。欧洲一体化和亚洲互联互通都是对一定区域内如何促进人、财、物、智有序地自由流动的回答。与欧洲不同,亚洲的核心问题是,如何在最大限度保留主权的前提下推进区域合作。以此,一个初步的互联互通分析框架得以构建,这一框架以跨国主义为方法论,以差异性为前提,以国家发展战略对接为主要内容,以基础设施建设为当前突破,以区域大国的责任和道义及政府间机制为持续保障,从而形成循环的对接过程。与区域合作的欧洲路径相比,亚洲互联互通路径对于发展中地区可能更具有借鉴意义。"互联互通"概念不应仅在政策领域探讨,而且应上升到区域合作理论层面,成为亚洲区域合作理论的内核。
European integration is known as a model of regional cooperation.However,the outbreak of European sovereign debt crisis and the Ukraine crisis,along with its moral issue reveal some profound challenges in the process of European integration.Simultaneously,European regional cooperation featuring developed markets is perhaps not suitable for other regions composed by developing countries.The key problem in Asia is how to promote regional cooperation on the premise of preserving sovereignty.Therefore,it is necessary to develop Asia's regional cooperation theory.On the basis of comparing regional cooperation in Asia with Europe,we set up a preliminary analytical framework for connectivity which is based on the transnational methodology and on the premise of diversity.First,promoting national development strategy connection is considered as the main content.Second,infrastructure construction is seen as the current breakthrough.Third,the responsibilities of major powers and intergovernmental mechanisms are the foundation of connectivity.Asia's approach is more likely to have a reference for developing regions,and connectivity should be researched at the level of regional cooperation theory.
出处
《世界经济与政治》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第6期70-92,157-158,共23页
World Economics and Politics
