摘要
关于怡府藏书的来源,陆心源的说法影响比较大,清代笔记大都沿用其说,直至今日,涉及到怡府藏书时仍被引用。但通过杨保彝《南北诸家藏书源流记》一文却发现了不同于陆氏的说法,杨氏讲到的由纳兰家入怡府和何焯之书亦归怡府的藏书来源之说均是前所未有的新说法,为我们进一步研究怡府藏书来源提供了重要史料,应该引起重视。
In terms of the library source of Yi Fu imperial clan in the Qing Dynasty,Lu Xinyuan's view was more influential,which was used in the Qing Dynasty notes. Until now,the view is still used when the library source of Yi Fu imperial clan in the Qing Dynasty is mentioned. From the article of The Collection Origin of North and South Bibliophile by Yang Baoyi,we find a different view from Lu Xinyuan,whose view is an unprecedented new claim about the library source because of the way of Nalan to Yi Fu and He Zhuo's library into Yi Fu. The view provides important historical data for the further study of Yi Fu library source,and should be taken seriously.
出处
《山东图书馆学刊》
2016年第3期110-112,117,共4页
The Library Journal of Shandong
关键词
怡府藏书
陆心源
允祥弘
晓纳兰揆
叙何焯
Library of Yi Fu imperial clan
Lu Xinyuan
Yun Xiang
Hong Xiao
Na Lan Kuixu
He Zhuo
