期刊文献+

单纯放疗与同步放化疗治疗宫颈癌患者的临床疗效 被引量:3

Curative effects of pure radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for patients with cerical cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨单纯放疗、同步放化疗治疗宫颈癌患者的疗效及不良反应.方法 研究对象为2010年5月-2012年5月在内蒙古医科大学附属医院接受治疗的127例宫颈癌患者.根据治疗方案分为两组:单纯放疗组65例,同步化放疗组62例.观察两组患者的疗效、不良反应和生存情况.结果 全组患者均顺利完成治疗,中位随访时间为42个月.单纯放疗组完全缓解率为80.00%(52/65),同步化放疗组完全缓解率为82.26%(51/62),差异无统计学意义(x2=1.22,P=0.352).单纯放疗组和同步放化疗组患者的1年总生存率分别为95.38%、95.16%,差异无统计学意义(x2=0.32,P=0.533);3年总生存率分别为81.54%、90.32%,5年总生存率分别为72.31%、83.87%,差异均具有统计学意义(x2 =5.09,P =0.015;x2=3.87,P=0.039).46例年龄≥60岁的患者单纯放疗组和同步放化疗组1年总生存率分别为94.62%、93.91%,3年总生存率分别为85.02%、87.25%,5年总生存率分别为70.06%、73.58%,差异均无统计学意义(x2=0.06,P=0.753;x2=1.16,P=0.279;x2=0.48,P=0.511).单纯放疗组和同步放化疗组不良反应主要以1—2级为主,其中白细胞减少(56.10%∶72.20%)、血小板减少(58.82%∶76.80%)、恶心呕吐(34.04%∶56.90%)发生率的差异均有统计学意义(x2=11.23,P=0.003;x2=11.82,P=0.002;x2=12.77,P=0.000).结论 同步放化疗治疗宫颈癌的疗效优于单纯放疗,可以提高3年和5年总生存率,但同时也应注意到同步放化疗可能引起的不良反应增加,对于年龄≥60岁的宫颈癌患者同步放化疗并未取得更大的生存获益. Objective To investigate the curative effects and adverse reactions of pure radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for patients with cervical cancer.Methods One hundred and twenty-seven patients with cervical cancer who accepted treatment in the Affliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical Unive.rsity from May 2010 to May 2012 were collected.All patients were divided into two groups:pure radiotherapy group (n =65) and concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy group (n =62).The curative effects,adverse reactions and survival of two groups were observed.Results All patients were completed treatment.The median follow-up time was 42 months.The rate of complete response in the pure radiotherapy group was 80.0% (52/65),and the rate in the concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy group was 82.26% (51/62),with no significant difference (x2 =1.22,P =0.352).The 1-year overall survival rates in the pure radiotherapy group and the concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy group were 95.38% and 95.16% respectively,with no significant difference (x2 =0.32,P =0.533),but the 3-year overall survival rates were 81.54% and 90.32% respectively,the 5-year overall survival rates were 72.31% and 83.87% respectively,with significant differences (x2 =5.09,P =0.015;x2=3.87,P =0.039).However,for the patients who were ≥ 60 years,the 1-year overall survival rates in the two groups were 94.62% and 93.91% respectively,the 3-year overall survival rates were 85.02% and 87.25% respectively,the 5-year overall survival rates were 70.06% and 73.58% respectively,with no significant differences (x2 =0.06,P =0.753;x2 =1.16,P =0.279;x2 =0.48,P =0.511).The adverse reactions were mainly in grades 1-2.There were significant differences in the rates of leucopenia (56.10% vs.72.20%),thrombocytopenia (58.82% vs.76.80%),nausea and vomiting (34.04% vs.56.90%) among the two treatment groups (x2 =11.23,P =0.003;x2 =11.82,P=0.002;x2 =12.77,P =0.000).Conclusion The curative effect of concurrent ch
出处 《国际肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2016年第6期428-432,共5页 Journal of International Oncology
基金 内蒙古自治区科技计划(20130403) Science and Technology Project of Inner Mongolia of China
关键词 宫颈肿瘤 放射疗法 同步放化疗 Uterine cervical neoplasms Radiotherapy Concurrent chemoradiotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Green JA, Kirwan JM, Tiemey JF, et al. Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix : a systematic review and meta-analysis [ J ]. Lancet, 2001, 358 (9284) : 781-786. 被引量:1
  • 2Whitney CW, Sause W, Bundy BN, et al. Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage 11 B-1VA carcinoma of the cervix with negative paraaortic lymph nodes: a gynecologic oncology group and southwest oncology group study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1999, 17(5) : 1339-1348. 被引量:1
  • 3Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J, et al. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for highrisk cervical cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 1999, 340(15): 1137- 1143. 被引量:1
  • 4Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, et al. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer [J]. N Engl J ned, 1999, 340(15) : 1144-1153. 被引量:1
  • 5Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB, et al. Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage I B cervical carcinoma [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 1999, 340 ( 15 ): 1154-1161. 被引量:1
  • 6Wei LC, Wang N, Shi M, et al. Clinical outcome observation of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy alone in 174 Chinese patients with local advanced cervical carcinoma [J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2013, 6: 67-74. 被引量:1
  • 7Reig A, Membrive I, Foro P, et al. Long-term results and prognostic factors of patients with cervical carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy[ J ]. Clin Transl Oncol, 2011, 13 (7) : 504-508. 被引量:1
  • 8Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration. Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26 (35) : 5802-5812. 被引量:1
  • 9Pearcey R, Miao Q, Kong W, et al. Impact of adoption of chemoradiotherapy on the outcome of cervical cancer in Ontario: results of a population-based cohort study [ J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25 (17) : 2383-2388. 被引量:1
  • 10Nagy V, Coza O, Ordeanu C, et al. Radiotherapy versus concurrent 5-day cisplatin and radiotherapy in locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Long-term results of a phase III randomized trail[ J]. Strahlen- ther Onkol, 2009, 185(3) : 177-183. 被引量:1

二级参考文献29

  • 1范剑虹,吴霞,何陈云.中晚期宫颈癌的同步放化疗[J].中国临床医学,2006,13(6):983-984. 被引量:17
  • 2余健,张国楠,樊英.同步放化疗治疗中晚期宫颈癌50例临床疗效观察[J].实用妇产科杂志,2007,23(5):287-289. 被引量:74
  • 3Whimey CW,Sause W,Bundy BN,et al.A randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stages ⅡBⅣA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes.A Gynecologic Oncolngy Group and Southwest Oncolngy Group Study.J Clin Oncol,1999,17:1339-1348. 被引量:1
  • 4Morris M,Eifel PJ,Lu J,et al.Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortie radiation for highrisk cervical cancer:a randomized Radiation Therapy Oncolngy Group clinical trial.N Engl J Med,1999,340:1137-1143. 被引量:1
  • 5Rose PG,Bundy BN,Watkius EB,et al.Concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiation improves progression free and overall survival in advanced cervical cancer.Results of a randomized Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.N Engl J Med,1999,340:1144-1153. 被引量:1
  • 6Peters WA Ⅲ,Liu PY,Barrett RJ,et al.Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil plus radiation therapy are superior to radiation therapy as adjunctive in high-risk early stage carcinoma of the cervicix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy:report of a phase,Ⅲ intergroup study.Gynecol Oncol,1999,72:443. 被引量:1
  • 7Keys HM,Bundy BM,Stehanm FB,et al.A comparison of weekly cisplatin during radiation therapy versus irradiation alone each followed by adjuvant hysterectomy in bulky stage ⅠB cervical carcinoma:a randomized trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group.N Engl J Med,1999,340:1154-1161. 被引量:1
  • 8Pearcey R,Mian Q,Kang W,et al.Impact of adoption of chemoradiotherapy on the outcome of cervical cancer in Ontario:results of a population-based cohort study.J Clin Oncol,2007,25:2383-2388. 被引量:1
  • 9Haie-Meder C,Fervers B,Fondrinier E,et al.SOR guidelines for concomitant chemoradiotherapy for patients with uterine cervical cancers:evidence update bulletin 2004.Ann Oncol,2005,16:1100-1108. 被引量:1
  • 10Pearcey R,Brundage M,Drouin P,et al.Phase Ⅲ trial comparing radical radiotherapy with and without cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with advanced squamous cell cancer of the cervix.J Clin Oncel,2002,20:966-972. 被引量:1

共引文献22

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部