摘要
伍德罗·威尔逊对战后世界秩序的构想一直是学者们关注的问题。在诸多的研究和争论中,似乎可以发现存在两个截然相对的威尔逊:一个是并不忌惮单边使用武力的新帝国主义者;一个是强调多边主义的自由国际主义者。学者们或是认为确实存在两个威尔逊,但经历了由前者向后者的转变;或是认为前者才是真正的威尔逊,而后者仅是前者的伪装。就事实而言,威尔逊的帝国主义逻辑更应被归类为家长式帝国主义,而非新帝国主义。这一逻辑同自由国际主义的逻辑一直贯穿威尔逊的整个执政过程。尽管两种逻辑的施行对象大为不同,但因二者始终并存威尔逊身上,且皆以推进自由主义生活方式的扩展为其目标,所以仍可视为只存在一个威尔逊。
Woodrow Wilson's project for postwar order has induced numerous studies,discussions and debates,among which there seemed to be two different versions of Wilson. One was a warlike neoimperialist,and the other was a liberal internationalist and multilateralist. Among those who thought there were two Wilsons,some held that Wilson experienced a transformation from the former to the latter,while others claimed that the former was the true Wilson,and the latter just a personae. As a matter of fact,Wilson's imperialism should be considered as paternalistic imperialism rather than neoimperialism. Furthermore, it co-existed with liberal internationalism throughout Wilson's presidency. Although implemented with different targets,the two thoughts in Wilson both aimed at the universalization of liberalism,which can be considered that there was only one Wilson.
出处
《世界历史》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第3期113-128,160,共16页
World History
基金
华东政法大学"华与罗世界文明与比较政治研究"项目(HDZ005)阶段性成果
