期刊文献+

Seismic safety assessment of existing masonry infill structures in Nepal

Seismic safety assessment of existing masonry infill structures in Nepal
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Reinforced concrete(RC) buildings in Nepal are constructed with RC frames and masonry infill panels. These structures exhibit a highly non-linear inelastic behavior resulting from the interaction between the panels and frames. This paper presents an extensive case study of existing RC buildings in Nepal. Non-linear analyses were performed on structural models of the buildings considered as a bare frame and with masonry infill, in order to evaluate the influence of infill walls on the failure mechanisms. Five three-storey buildings with different structural configurations and detailing were selected. The effect of masonry infill panels on structural response was delineated by comparing the bare-framed response with the infill response. Seismic performance is evaluated with regard to global strength, stiffness, energy dissipation, inter-storey drift, and total deflection of the structure. A parametric analysis of structures with masonry infill is also performed. For this, the influence of different material properties is studied, namely diagonal compressive stress, modulus of elasticity and tensile stress of masonry infill panels. Study results show that masonry infill increases the global strength and stiffness of the structures; it decreases the inter-storey drift and hence the total displacement of the structure. The results quantify the influence of the infill panels on structural response and, in particular, the effect of the diagonal compressive strength of the masonry wall. Reinforced concrete(RC) buildings in Nepal are constructed with RC frames and masonry infill panels. These structures exhibit a highly non-linear inelastic behavior resulting from the interaction between the panels and frames. This paper presents an extensive case study of existing RC buildings in Nepal. Non-linear analyses were performed on structural models of the buildings considered as a bare frame and with masonry infill, in order to evaluate the influence of infill walls on the failure mechanisms. Five three-storey buildings with different structural configurations and detailing were selected. The effect of masonry infill panels on structural response was delineated by comparing the bare-framed response with the infill response. Seismic performance is evaluated with regard to global strength, stiffness, energy dissipation, inter-storey drift, and total deflection of the structure. A parametric analysis of structures with masonry infill is also performed. For this, the influence of different material properties is studied, namely diagonal compressive stress, modulus of elasticity and tensile stress of masonry infill panels. Study results show that masonry infill increases the global strength and stiffness of the structures; it decreases the inter-storey drift and hence the total displacement of the structure. The results quantify the influence of the infill panels on structural response and, in particular, the effect of the diagonal compressive strength of the masonry wall.
出处 《Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration》 SCIE EI CSCD 2016年第2期251-268,共18页 地震工程与工程振动(英文刊)
基金 supported by the Eurasian University Network for International Cooperation in Earthquake(EU-NICE)
关键词 frames diagonal panels compressive drift hence quantify tensile stiffness rotation frames diagonal panels compressive drift hence quantify tensile stiffness rotation
  • 相关文献

参考文献46

  • 1Bell DK and Davidson BJ (2001), "Evaluation of Earthquake Risk Buildings with Masonry lnfill Panels," Technical Conference, Future Directions." A Vision for Earthquake Engineering in New Zealand, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Taupo, New Zealand. 被引量:1
  • 2Bothara J and Hiqyllmaz K (2008), "General Observations of Building Behaviour during the 8th October 2005 Pakistan Earthquake," Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 41(4): 209-233. 被引量:1
  • 3Buratti N, Ferracuti B and Savoia M (2010), "Response Surface with Random Factors for Seismic Fragility of Concrete Frames," Structural Safety, 32(1): 42-51. 被引量:1
  • 4CEN (2003), Eurocode 8: Earthquake Resistance - and Repair of Buildings - European Committee for Belgium. Design of Structures for Part 1-3: Strengthening European prEN 1998-1-3, Standardization, Brussels,. 被引量:1
  • 5Chaulagain H, Rodrigues H, Spacone E and Varum H (2014), "Study on Design Procedures of Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Nepal and Its Impact on Seismic Safety," Advances in Structural Engineering 17(10): 1419-1442. 被引量:1
  • 6Crisafulli FJ (1997), "Seismic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Structures with Masonry Infills," PhD Thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand. 被引量:1
  • 7Dhanesekar M and Page AW (1986), "The Influence of Brick Masonry Infill Properties on the Behavior of Infill Frames," Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 81: 593-603. 被引量:1
  • 8Dogangun A (2004), "Performance of ReinforcedConcrete Buildings during the May 1, 2003 Bingo Earthquake in Turkey," Journal of Engineering Structures, 26(6): 841-856. 被引量:1
  • 9Dolgek M and Fajfar P (2005), "Simplified Non-linear Seismic Analysis of Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frames," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamic, 34(1): 49-66. 被引量:1
  • 10Elnashai AS and Elghazouli AY (1993), "Performance of Composite Steel/concrete Members under Earthquake Loading, Part I: Analytical Model," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 22(4): 315-345. 被引量:1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部