期刊文献+

汽车尾气排放标准提高的经济影响与减排效果——基于可计算一般均衡(CGE)模型的分析 被引量:7

Economic and Environmental Effects of Improved Auto Fuel Economy Standard in China: A CGE Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于一般均衡理论,利用CHINAGEM模型,对提高汽车尾气排放标准实施产生的经济和环境影响进行实证研究。通过调整汽油精炼和汽车零部件行业的生产税税率,发现国Ⅳ、国Ⅴ新标准实施使得劳动力成本上升,GDP略有下降,利于出口导向型行业发展。新标准一旦全面实施,会抑制汽车制造等行业的整体发展,国产车产量将有所下降,从而增加进口汽车对国产汽车的替代。研究发现,随着排放标准的提高以及汽车产量增速的减缓,中国的大气污染问题会有所缓解。根据模型对载客汽车和载货汽车尾气排放污染物的预测,新标准实施后2018年的一氧化碳、碳氢化合物、氮氧化物和总颗粒物排放量分别减少3952.03,3751.34,1163.23和166.27万吨,减排比例分别达到32%,36%,63%和87%,表明该政策的实施可以产生十分可观的减排效果。 The authors use CHINAGEM, a computable general equilibrium model to investigate the economic effect and pollution reduction impacts of improved auto fuel economy standard in China. The policy change is modelled as shocks to production tax rate of two industries -- petrol refine and motor vehicle parts. The results show that the shocks lead to higher labor cost, slightly decreased GDP and improved terms of trade. The majority of industries, such as motor vehicle manufacturing, will undergo downsizing because of new standards and substitution of imported motor vehicles for domestic ones. However, with improved emission standard and slowdown of vehicle production growth, air pollution problem will be alleviated. Based on the model prediction, the annual emission reductions of carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides and total particulate matter amount to 39.52, 37.51, 11.63 and 1.66 million tons respectively, which are 32, 36, 63, and 87 percentage reduction from the respective business-as-usual levels.
出处 《北京大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期515-527,共13页 Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis
基金 北京大学国家发展研究院能源安全与国家发展研究中心资助
关键词 CGE模型 汽车尾气排放标准 经济影响 减排效果 CGE model auto fuel economy standard economic effect emission reductions
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Vanden K F, Wing I S. Accounting for quality: issues with modeling the impact of R&D on economic growth and carbon emissions in developing econo- mics. Energy Economics, 2008, 30:2771-2784. 被引量:1
  • 2肖皓,赖明勇.燃油税改革的动态一般均衡分析[J].经济数学,2009,26(3):53-59. 被引量:13
  • 3Lin BQ, Jiang Z J. Estimates of energy subsidies in China and impact of energy subsidy reform. Energy Economics, 2011, 33:273-283. 被引量:1
  • 4Dong H J, Dai H C, Dong L, et al. Pursuing air pollutant co-benefits of CO2 mitigation in China: a provincial leveled analysis. Applied Energy, 2015, 144:165-174. 被引量:1
  • 5Conrad K. Traffic, transportation, infrastructure and externalities -- a theoretical framework for a CGE analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, 1997, 31: 369-389. 被引量:1
  • 6Conrad K, Heng S. Financing road infrastructure by saving in congestion costs: a CGE analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, 2002, 36:107-122. 被引量:1
  • 7Schafer A, Jacoby H D. Technology detail in a multisector CGE model: policy. Energy Economics, transport under climate 2005, 27:1-24. 被引量:1
  • 8Yan F, Winijkul E, Jung S, et al. Global emission projections of particulate matter (PM): I. exhaust emissions from on-road vehicles. Atmospheric Envir- onment. 2011, 45:4830-4844. 被引量:1
  • 9Viard V B, Fu S H. The effect of Beijing's driving restrictions on pollution and economic activity. Journal of Public Economics, 2015, 125:98-115. 被引量:1
  • 10梁静.国Ⅳ:“爱你”不容易[J].时代汽车,2008(4):20-24. 被引量:1

二级参考文献25

共引文献23

同被引文献95

引证文献7

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部