期刊文献+

血管超声和经导管造影诊断颈动脉狭窄的效果对比 被引量:5

Effective comparison of vascular ultrasound and angiography in diagnosis of carotid stenosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较血管超声和经导管造影诊断颈动脉狭窄的诊断价值。方法选取2014年1月至12月疑似颈动脉狭窄的患者98例,均经血管超声和经导管造影检测,比较血管超声和经导管造影诊断颈动脉狭窄的准确率和敏感度。结果血管超声见50例52支颈动脉狭窄,导管造影见53例56支颈动脉狭窄。血管超声对重度颈动脉狭窄和总动脉狭窄检测准确度及特异度比较差异未见统计学意义(P >0.05),但对总动脉狭窄的敏感度高于重度颈动脉,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论血管超声检查能准确和有效地诊断脑血管患者的颈动脉狭窄。 Objective To compare the clinical diagnosis value of vascular ultrasound and tran-scatheter angiography on carotid artery stenosis. Methods From January 2014 to December 2014,98 patients with carotid artery stenosis were selected. All patients were taken by vascular ultrasound and transcatheter angiography to diagnose,and their examination results,accuracy and sensitivity of two dif-ferent methods were compared and analyzed. Results Fifty patients were found carotid artery stenosis by vascular ultrasound and 52 branches of stenosed vessels were detected. Fifty-three patients were found ca-rotid artery stenosis by transcatheter angiography and 56 branches of stenosed vessels were detected,the differences were not significant(P 〉 0. 05),but sensitivity of the latter was higher obviously than the for-mer,the differences was significant(P 〈 0. 05). Conclusions Vascular ultrasound examination can di-agnose carotid artery stenosis of patients with cerebrovascular disease accurately and effectively.
作者 鲁靖
出处 《中国实用医刊》 2016年第10期78-79,共2页 Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 血管造影 血管超声 颈动脉狭窄 诊断 Angiography Vascular ultrasound Carotid artery stenosis Diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献61

共引文献73

同被引文献30

引证文献5

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部