期刊文献+

最大限度雄激素阻断治疗后前列腺癌患者的认知功能状况及其影响因素分析 被引量:5

Analysis of cognitive function and its influenced factors in patients with prostate cancer aftermaximalanOrogen blockade therapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨最大限度雄激素阻断治疗后前列腺癌患者认知功能状况及其影响因素,为早期制定预防策略提供新思路。方法2013年1月至2015年10月采用蒙特利尔认知功能评估表(MoCA)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HAD)、社会支持评定量表(SSRS)及自行设计的调查问卷对56例接受最大限度雄激素阻断(maximaandrogenblockade,MAB)治疗≥6个月和37例接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的前列腺癌患者进行认知功能测试及各项观察指标收集,以MoCA评分26分为界,分为认知功能障碍组40例,正常组53例,对两组患者的各项观察指标进行比较,对不同治疗方式患者的认知功能变化情况进行分析,对影响患者认知功能状况的因素应用多因素Logistic回归分析进行筛选。结果认知功能障碍组与正常组在接受MAB治疗比例[80.0%(32/40)vs.45.3%(24/53)]、年龄(73.7岁VS.62.6岁)、独居状况[32.5%(13/40)vs.13.2%(7/53)]、抑郁症状[87.5%(35/40)VS.62.3%(33/53)]、社会支持水平(32.5分vs.41.1分)和睾酮降低者比例[95.0%(38/40)vs.45.3%(24/53)]等方面差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。MAB组与根治性手术组相比,睾酮水平[(0.27±0.15)nmoL/LV8.(12.14±1.86)nmol/L],视空间与执行功能[(4.18±0.79)分vs.(4.54±0.56)分]、注意[(4.73±0.99)分vs.(5.16±0.79)分]、延迟记忆[(3.75±1.21)分vs.(4.30±1.05)分]评分及MoCA总分[(26.13±1.48)分vs.(27.27±1.39)分]上差异有统计学意义(P〈0。05)。多因素回归分析结果显示,年龄(OR=1.183,95%C1l-135+1.223)、抑郁症状(OR=1.092,95%CI1.047—1.149)、社会支持水平(OR=0.897,95%C10.838—0.956)、睾酮水平(OR=2.105,95%CI1.369~4.083)是认知功能障碍的影响因素。结论 Objective To investigate the cognitive function of patients with prostate cancer after maximal androgen blockade therapy and its influenced factors, and to provide a new way for early prevention strategy. Methods Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), hospital anxiety depression scale (HAD), social support rating scale (SSRS) and self-designed questionnaire were used in 56 cases treated with maximum androgen blockade therapy for more than six months and 37 cases who underwent radical prostatectomy treatment to evaluate their cognitive function and collect the observation indexes between January 2013 and October 2015. Based on MoCA score, all patients were divided into cognitive dysfunction group (n =40) and normal cognitive function group (n =53). The observation indexes in two goups were compared and cognitive function with different treatment in two groups were analyzed. The changes on the influencing factors of cognitive function in patients were filtered using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results In the cognitive dysfunction group and normal group, the proportion of MAB treatment was 80.0% (32/40) vs. 45.3 % (24/53). the are was 73.7 vs. 73.7 years, the uronortion of solitary was32. 5% (13/40) vs. 13.2% (7/53), the proportion of depressive symptoms was 87.5% (35/40) vs. 62. 3% (33/53), the social support level was 32. 5 vs. 41.1 and the proportion of testosterone decreased was 95.0% (38/40) vs. 45.3% (24/53). All events showed statistically significant differences ( P 〈 0. 05). Compared MAB treatment group with radical surgical treatment group, the testosterone level was (0. 27 ± 0. 15 ) vs. ( 12. 14 ± 1.86) nmol/L, visual space and executive function score was 4. 18 ± 0. 79 vs. 4. 54 ±0. 56, attention score was 4. 73 +0. 99 vs. 5. 16 ±0. 79, delayed memory score was 3.75 ± 1. 21 vs. 4. 30 ±1.05 and MoCA score was 26. 13± 1.48 vs. 27.27 ± 1.39, which all showed the statistically significant difference (P 〈 0. 05 )
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第5期349-353,共5页 Chinese Journal of Urology
基金 山西省科技攻关项目(20140313011-12) 山西省回国留学人员科研资助项目(2015-099)
关键词 前列腺癌 最大限度雄激素阻断 认知功能 Prostate cancer Maximal androgen blockade Cognitive function
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics,2008 [ J ]. CA Cancer J Clin,2008 ,58 :71-96. DOI: 10. 3322/CA. 2007. 0010. 被引量:1
  • 2那彦群,叶章群,孙颖浩等著..中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南手册 2014版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:830.
  • 3Nelson CJ, Lee JS, Gamboa MC, et al. Cognitive effects of hormone therapy in men with prostate caneer: a review [ J ]. Cancer ,2008,113 : 1097-1106. DOI: 10. 1002/crier. 23658. 被引量:1
  • 4Plassman BL, Langa KM, Fishe GG, et al. Prevalence of cognitive impairment without dementia in the United States [ J l- Ann Intern Med,2008,148:427-434. DOI: 10. 7326/0003-4819- 148-6-200803180-00005. 被引量:1
  • 5张志强,于德新,谢栋栋,杨琳琳,施浩强,李光远,张芳芳,王毅,张涛,丁德茂.全雄激素阻断治疗后老年前列腺癌患者认知功能的变化特点[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2014,35(3):200-204. 被引量:9
  • 6Yaffe K, Lui LY, Zmuda J, et al. Sex hormones and cognitivefunction in older men[J]. J Am Geriatr Soe,2002,50:707-712. DOI: 10. 1046/j. 1532-5415. 2002. 50166. x. 被引量:1
  • 7Moffat SD, Zonderman AB, Metter EJ, et al. Longitudinal assessment of serum free testosterone concentration predicts memory performance and cognitive status in elderly men [J]. J Clin Endoerinol Metab,2002,87:5001-5007. DOI: 10. 1210/jc. 2002 -020419. 被引量:1
  • 8Wolf OT, Preut R, Hellhammer DH, et al. Testosterone and cognition in elderly men: a single testosterone injection blocks the practice effect in verbal fluency, but has no effect on spatial or verbal memory[ J]. Biol Psychiatry,2000,47:650-654. DOI : 10. 1016/s0006-3223 (99) 00145-6. 被引量:1
  • 9Thilers PP, Macdonald SW, Herlitz A. The association between endogenous free testosterone and cognitive performance : a population-based study in 35 to 90 year-old men and women [ J ]. 2006,31:565-576. DOI: 10. 1016/j psyneuen. 2005.12. 005. 被引量:1
  • 10Hogervorst E, Williams J, Budge M, et al. Serum total testosterone is lower in men with Alzheimer's disease[ J]. Neuro Endocrinol Lett ,2001,22 : 163-168. 被引量:1

二级参考文献55

共引文献47

同被引文献55

引证文献5

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部