期刊文献+

苯妥英钠预防颅脑损伤后早期癫痫的Meta分析 被引量:5

Phenytoin prophylactic therapy against early epilepsy after craniocerebral injury:a meta analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:通过系统评价有关苯妥英钠预防颅脑损伤后早期癫痫的文献,评估苯妥英钠预防颅脑损伤后早期癫痫发作的有效性。方法:在Medline数据库、Pubmed数据库、Embase数据库和Cochrane Library和中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、万方数据库中输入检索词检索有关苯妥英钠用于颅脑损伤后早期癫痫防治的随机对照试验(randomized controlled trials,RCTs)文献,并且筛选符合纳入标准的文献,提取文献中数据进行Meta分析。采用相对危险度(relative risk,RR)分析早期癫痫的发作率。研究间的异质性采用Q检验法检验,并采用经自由度(文献数)校正后的I2值进行定量。若异质性检验结果为P>0.01,或I2≤50%,用固定效应模型(fixed-effect model)计算合并效应;反之,采用随机效应模型(randomized-effect model)计算合并效应。结果:共纳入1 657位患者在内的8篇文献,861位患者纳入苯妥英钠试验组,796位患者纳入阴性对照组。各文献间异质性不明显(I2=8%,P=0.36),采用固定效应模型对早期癫痫防治作用进行META分析。结果显示,在颅脑损伤中苯妥英钠试验组早期癫痫发作率较对照组低,2组差异有统计学意义(RR=0.38,95%CI:0.26,0.56,P<0.000 01);在颅脑创伤中苯妥英钠试验组早期癫痫较对照组低,2组差异有统计学意义(RR=0.33,95%CI:0.19,0.59,P=0.000 2);在颅脑外科手术中苯妥英钠试验组早期癫痫发作率较对照组低,2组差异有统计学意义(RR=0.43,95%CI:0.25,0.71,P=0.001)。结论:苯妥英钠能够有效预防颅脑损伤后早期癫痫发作。 OBJECTIVE To evaluate prophylactic efficacy of phenytion against epilepsy after craniocerebral injury by Meta-analysis.METHODS Relevant RCTs were identified by searching electronic databases including Medline,Pubmed,Embase,Cochrane Library,CNKI,CBM and WANFANG.Eligible articles were included to extract data.Relative risk(RR)was used to analyze ratios of early seizures.Inter-study heterogeneity was evaluated by using chi square test-based Qtest.I2 was a fixed-effect model was employed to calculate pooled effects if P〈 0.1 or I〈50%;otherwise,a randomized-effect model was used.RESULTS A total of 1 487 unduplicated papers were identified,and 1 378 papers of them were excluded by reading abstracts and titles.Another 101 papers were excluded after reading their complete texts.Eventually 8 papers on random control trials(RCTs)were included.These 8 literatures included 1657 patients,861 patients in phenytoin group and 796 in placebo or no treatment control group.There was no significant heterogeneity between literatures.Fixed-effect model was used for analysis.Results showed phenytoin group had less early seizures in craniocerebral injury patients(RR=0.38,95%CI:0.26,0.56,P〈0.000 01),craniocerebral trauma patients(RR=0.33,95%CI:0.19,0.59,P=0.0002)and craniocerebral surgery patients(RR=0.43,95%CI:0.25,0.71,P=0.001)than control group.CONCLUSION Phenytoin can effectively prevent early epilepsy after craniocerebral injury.
出处 《中国医院药学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第10期833-837,共5页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
关键词 苯妥英钠 颅脑损伤 早期癫痫 META分析 phenytoin craniocerebral trauma craniocerebral injury early seizures meta analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Hauser WA, Annegers JF, Kurland LT. Prevalence of Epilepsy in Rochester, Minnesota: 1940-1980 [J]. Epilepsia, 1991. 32 (4) : 429-445. 被引量:1
  • 2颅脑疾病手术后抗癫痫药物应用的专家共识(试行)[J].中华神经外科杂志,2012,28(7):751-754. 被引量:61
  • 3Raymont V,Salazar AM, Lipsky R,et al. Correlates of posttraumatic epilepsy 35 years following combat brain injury[J]. Neurology, 2010,75 (3) : 224-229. 被引量:1
  • 4Temkin NR. Antiepileptogenesis and seizure prevention trials with antiepileptic drugs: META-analysis of controlled trials [J]. Epilepsia,2001,42:515-524. 被引量:1
  • 5Temkin NR. Preventing and treating posttraumatic seizures: the human experience [J]. Epilepsia, 2009, 50 ( suppl. 2) : 10- 13. 被引量:1
  • 6Chang BS, Lowenstein DH. Practice parameter: Antiepileptic drug prophylaxis in severe traumatic brain injury: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology[J]. Neurology, 2003,60 : 10-16. 被引量:1
  • 7Wu AS, Trinh VT, Suki D, et a l. A prospective randomized tri- al of perioperative seizure prophylaxis in patients with intrapa- renchymal brain tumors [J]. J Neurosurg, 2013,118 (4) : 873- 83. 被引量:1
  • 8文进,李幼平.Meta分析中效应尺度指标的选择[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(8):606-613. 被引量:130
  • 9Temkin NR, Dikmen SS, Wilensky AJ, et al. A randomized, double-blind study of phenytoin for the prevention of post- traumatic seizures [J]. N Engl J Med, 1990,323 (8) : 497-502. 被引量:1
  • 10Young B, Rapp RP, Norton JA, et al. Failure of prophylactical- ly administered phenytoin to prevent early posttraumatic sei- zures [J]. J Neurosurg, 1983,58(2) : 231-235. 被引量:1

二级参考文献7

  • 1Higgins JPT,Green S,editors.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6[updated September 2006].In:The Cochrane Library,Issue 4,2006.Chichester,UK:John Wiley & Sons,Ltd. 被引量:1
  • 2Deeks JJ.Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for metaanalysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes.Statistics in Medicine,2002,21:1575-1600 被引量:1
  • 3Cook TD.Advanced statistics:up with odds ratios! A case for odds ratios when outcomes are common.Academic Emergency Medicine,2002,9:1430-1434 被引量:1
  • 4Sackett DL,Deeks JJ,Altman DG.Down with odds ratios! Evidence-BasedMedicine,1996,1:164-167 被引量:1
  • 5Deeks J.When can odds ratios mislead? British Medical Journal 1998,317:1155. 被引量:1
  • 6Senn S.Odds ratios revisited.Evidence-Based Medicine 1998,3:71. 被引量:1
  • 7Olkin I.Odds ratios revisited.Evidence-Based Medicine 1998,3:71. 被引量:1

共引文献189

同被引文献33

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部