摘要
为比较腹腔镜治疗腹膜内型膀胱破裂与传统术式的临床疗效，回顾分析笔者所在医院2011年8月～2015年12月收治的腹膜内型膀胱破裂患者32例的临床资料，采用腹腔镜治疗14例患者为观察组，传统术式治疗的18例为对照组。结果显示观察组患者手术时间、出血量、术后疼痛评分、进食时间、下地活动时间、术后住院时间优于对照组（P〈O．05）。腹腔镜治疗腹膜内型膀胱破裂具有安全、创伤小、痛苦小、恢复快、并发症少等优点，可参考作为该病的首选治疗方式。
To explore the clinical significance between traditional surgery combined with laparoseopic repair of intraperitoneal bladder rupture. Retrospective analysis was made with the clinical data of 32 patients who suffered from intraperitoneal bladder rupture from Aug. 2011 to Dec. 2015, and 14 cases received laparoscopic repair as the observation group,other 18 cases as control group. The results were as pain score, eating time, first ambulation time, postoperative follows： the operation time, bleeding volume, postoperative hospital stay and complications is lesser in observation group than that in control group （P〈0.05）. So we concluded that taparoscopic repair of intraperitoneal bladder rupture was safe with less trauma, less pain, faster recovery, fewer complications and so on, so it could be the first choice of intraperitoneal bladder rupture.
出处
《医学与哲学（B）》
2016年第4期23-25,共3页
Medicine & Philosophy(B)
关键词
膀胱破裂
腹膜内型
腹腔镜
bladder rupture, intraperitoneal type, laparoscopy
