期刊文献+

借款陈述会影响借款成本和借款成功率吗?——基于网络借贷陈述的文本分析 被引量:55

Could the Loan Description Affect the Loan Cost and the Loan Success Rate?Textual Analysis Based on the Loan Description
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以Prosper网络借贷平台上2007年12月至2012年2月的交易数据为样本,从文本分析的视角对比研究利率形成机制变动前后借款陈述对借款成功率和实际借款利率的影响。实证表明:在利率竞拍模式下信用等级越低的借款人越倾向于提供借款陈述,借款陈述的迷雾指数和文本长度都与借款成功率呈现"倒U型"关系,并与实际借款利率存在线性正相关关系;其次,在固定利率模式下,借款利率与借款陈述长度存在显著的"U型"关系,与迷雾指数只表现出线性正相关关系;最后,在两种利率模式下借款人提供借款陈述都能降低借款成本,但是不一定能增加借款成功率,且信用等级较低的借款人提供借款陈述对借贷行为的影响更大。 Whether the loan descriptions have effects on P2P lending behaviors in different formation mechanisms of interest rate is tested from the perspective of textual analysis,using the transaction data on Prosper between December 2007 and February 2012. The results show,in the auction mode of interest rates,borrowers whose credit ratings are lower are more inclined to provide the loan description; both of fog indexes and lengths of loan descriptions form an inverted U-shaped relation to the loan success rate and have a linear positive correlation with the interest rate. Second,the interest rates form a U-shaped relation to the lengths of loan descriptions and are positively correlated with the fog indexes in the pre-set rates mode. Third,providing the loan description could decrease the interest rate,but fails to increase the success rate,and the impacts of providing the loan description are more obvious for borrowers with a lower credit rating in both mechanisms.
出处 《金融研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期158-173,共16页 Journal of Financial Research
关键词 借款陈述 P2P借贷 文本分析 Loan Description P2P Lending Textual Analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

二级参考文献120

  • 1李钧.P2P借贷:性质、风险与监管[J].金融发展评论,2013(3):35-50. 被引量:84
  • 2郭忠金,林海霞.P2P网上借贷信用机制研究——以拍拍贷为例[J].现代管理科学,2013,1(5):90-92. 被引量:27
  • 3[1]Adelberg, A. H. 1979. Narrative disclosures contained in financial reports: Means of communication or manipulation? Accounting and Business Research (Summer): 179 - 189 被引量:1
  • 4[2]Baker Ⅲ. H. E. and D. D. Kare. 1992. Relationship between annual report readability and corporate financial performance.Management Research News 15:1 -4 被引量:1
  • 5[3]Courtis. J. K. 1986. An investigation into annual report readability and corporate risk return relationships. Accounting and Business Resrch (Autumn): 285 - 294 被引量:1
  • 6[4]Courtis. J. K. 1995. Readability of annual reports: western versus asian evidence. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal vol. 8, no. 2 被引量:1
  • 7[5]Jones. M. J. 1998. Annual report readability variability: Tests of the obfuscation gypothesis. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, vol. 11, no. 4, 459-471 被引量:1
  • 8[6]Jones. M. J. 1996. Comments on eadability of annual reports: western versus asian evidence. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal vol. 9, No. 2:86-91 被引量:1
  • 9[7]Jones. M. J. and Shoemaker. P. A. 1994. Accounting narratives: A review of emirical studies of content and readability. Journal of Accounting Literature, vol. 13: 142- 184 被引量:1
  • 10[8]Jones. M. J. 1988. Accounting Narratives: A Review of Empirical Studies of Content and Readability, Journal of Accounting Literature, vol. 13: 142-184 被引量:1

共引文献627

同被引文献543

引证文献55

二级引证文献1498

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部