期刊文献+

睡眠剥夺影响风险决策的双系统模型探讨 被引量:15

The effect of sleep deprivation on risky choice: A dual-process models approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 睡眠剥夺是指由于环境或自身原因无法满足正常睡眠时间的情况。大量实证研究发现,睡眠剥夺会导致个体在风险决策中更倾向于风险寻求,同时也有研究表明睡眠剥夺会导致个体风险规避,而目前尚无统一结论。睡眠剥夺从风险感知、风险容忍、风险决策策略三个方面影响了风险决策,其心理机制可由认知和情绪双路径模型进行解释,且脑神经生理学研究也提供了相关证据。未来的研究应该进一步关注:(1)现实工作生活中的睡眠不足对风险决策的影响;(2)睡眠剥夺影响风险决策的理论模型建构。 Sleep deprivation is a situation of shorter-than-optimal sleep time caused by some environmental or individual reasons. A variety of empirical researches studied the relationship between sleep deprivation and risky choice, but there was an argument about whether sleep deprivation leaded to risk-taking. This paper tried to explore the psychological mechanism between sleep deprivation and risky choice. There are three elements influence risky decision making,(i.e., risk perception, risk tolerance and risk decision strategies), and its psychological mechanism can be explained by dual-process models of cognition and emotion. Furthermore, neural studies provided evidences to support our conclusion. In the future, on the one hand, because most sleep deprivation studies were examined in laboratory, more researches should be focused on the sleep loss in real life; on the other hand, interaction effect of cognition and emotion should be considered to further complete the theoretical model of sleep deprivation and risky choice.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第5期804-814,共11页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(项目编号:71271101,71571087),广东省人文社科研究基地“企业发展研究所”基金 重点项目育题基金支持.
关键词 睡眠剥夺 风险感知 风险容忍 风险决策 决策双系统 sleep deprivation risk perception risk tolerance risky choice dual-process models
  • 相关文献

参考文献74

  • 1孙彦,李纾,殷晓莉.决策与推理的双系统——启发式系统和分析系统[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):721-726. 被引量:147
  • 2肖前国,罗乐,余林.推理与决策的双加工理论研究简评[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(2):321-324. 被引量:16
  • 3谢晓非,徐联仓.风险认知研究概况及理论框架[J].心理科学进展,1995,5(2):17-22. 被引量:176
  • 4张颖,冯廷勇.青少年风险决策的发展认知神经机制[J].心理科学进展,2014,22(7):1139-1148. 被引量:15
  • 5Bachoo, S., Bhagwanjee, A., & Govender, K. (2013, The influence of anger, impulsivity, sensation seeking and driver attitudes on risky driving behaviour among post-graduate university students in Durban, South Africa. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 55, 67-76. 被引量:1
  • 6Banks, S., Catcheside, P., Lack, L., Grunstein, R. R., & McEvoy, R. D. (2004, Low levels of alcohol impairdriving simulator performance and reduce perception of crash risk in partially sleep deprived subjects. Sleep, 27(6), 1063-1067. 被引量:1
  • 7Banks, S., & Dinges, D. F. (2007, Behavioral and physiological consequences of sleep restriction. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 3(5), 519-528. 被引量:1
  • 8Bayard, S., Langenier, M. C., & Dauvilliers, Y. (2013, Decision-making, reward-seeking behaviors and dopamine agonist therapy in restless legs syndrome. Sleep, 36(10), 1501-1507. 被引量:1
  • 9Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Anderson, S. W. (1998), Dissociation of working memory from decision making within the human prefrontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 18(1), 428,37. 被引量:1
  • 10Bechara, A., (2005, Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: A neurocognitive perspective. Nature Neuroscience, 8(11), 1458-1463. 被引量:1

二级参考文献123

  • 1Cleeremans, A., & Jimenez, L. (2002). Implicit learning and A graded, dynamical perspective. In: French R M. & Cleeremans, A. (Eds.), Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, philosophical and computational consensus in the making (1-40). Hove: Psychology Press. 被引量:1
  • 2Epstein, S., Pacini, R. (1999). dual-process theories from Some basic issues regarding the perspective of cognitive --experiential theory. In Chaiken, S., Trope, Y., (Editors), Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, Guilford Press, New York, 462-482. 被引量:1
  • 3Evans, J. S. B. T. (1996). Deciding before you think: Relevance and reasoning in the selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 223-240. 被引量:1
  • 4Evans, J. S. B. T. & West, R. F. (2002). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-726. 被引量:1
  • 5Evans, J. S. B. T. (2006). The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 13, 378-395. 被引量:1
  • 6Evans, J. S. B. T. (2007). On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 12, 123-145. 被引量:1
  • 7Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition. Annual Review Psychology, 59, 255-278. 被引量:1
  • 8Frenseh, P. A., Buchner, A., & Lin, J. (1994). Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transition in the presence and absence of a distraction task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 567-584. 被引量:1
  • 9Gigerenzer, O., & Regier, T. (1996). How do we tell an association from a rule: Comment on Sloman. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 23-26. 被引量:1
  • 10Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., & Nystrom, L. E. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105-2108. 被引量:1

共引文献338

同被引文献143

引证文献15

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部